Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Coding ethical behaviour: the challenges of biological weapons.

Brian Rappert1

  • 1Department of Sociology, School of Historical, Political and Sociological Studies, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4RJ, United Kingdom. B.Rappert@exeter.ac.uk

Science and Engineering Ethics
|December 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Biosecurity concerns have risen since 2001, impacting civilian research. This study explores balancing security and openness in biomedical research through scientist codes of conduct.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Practical points of failure in police-university collaboration: reconceiving knowledge exchange.

Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice·2025
Same author

Counting the dead and making the dead count: configuring data and accountability.

History and philosophy of the life sciences·2021
Same author

On conveying and not conveying expertise.

Social studies of science·2015
Same author

Why has Not There been More Research of Concern?

Frontiers in public health·2014
Same author

The case for addressing explosive weapons: conflict, violence and health.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2012
Same author

Enhancing the protection of civilians from armed conflict: precautionary lessons.

Medicine, conflict, and survival·2010

Area of Science:

  • Biosecurity and Bioethics
  • Public Health Policy
  • Scientific Governance

Background:

  • Post-9/11 era heightened concerns regarding biological weapons threats.
  • Increased scrutiny of civilian society activities for security control applications.
  • The need to integrate security measures within scientific research environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine national and international strategies for balancing security and openness in civilian biomedical research.
  • To investigate the role of professional codes of conduct for scientists in this integration.
  • To address the fundamental societal position of science in relation to security concerns.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of national and international policy documents and initiatives.
Keywords:
Bioethics and Professional EthicsBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchWar and Human Rights Abuses

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of ethical frameworks and professional codes of conduct for scientists.
  • Literature review on biosecurity, scientific openness, and research ethics.

    • Main Results:

    • Current efforts focus on integrating security controls into civilian research settings.
    • Professional codes of conduct are proposed as a mechanism for managing security-research dilemmas.
    • Reconciling research appropriateness with security concerns presents significant challenges.

    Conclusions:

    • Establishing effective codes of conduct requires addressing complex ethical and societal questions.
    • Future codes must navigate the tension between scientific advancement and security imperatives.
    • The integration of biosecurity into biomedical research necessitates a re-evaluation of science's societal role.