Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
Coronary bypass grafting for patients dependent on dialysis: modified ultrafiltration for perioperative management
Masaki Otaki1, Takeshi Enmoto, Hidetaka Oku
1Saiseikai Kyoto Hospital, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyoto, Japan.
Insights
Modified ultrafiltration (UF) significantly reduced operative mortality and complications in dialysis patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting compared to continuous hemofiltration (CHF). This renal support strategy improved outcomes, including shorter ICU stays and reduced blood loss.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Nephrology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Coronary bypass grafting (CABG) in dialysis patients carries high operative mortality and poor long-term survival.
- Optimizing renal support strategies is crucial for improving outcomes in this high-risk population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of continuous hemofiltration (CHF) versus modified ultrafiltration (UF) for renal support during and after CABG in dialysis-dependent patients.
- To evaluate the impact of different renal support strategies on operative mortality, morbidity, and long-term outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 33 dialysis-dependent patients undergoing CABG.
- Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (12 patients) received CHF, and Group B (21 patients) received modified UF.
- Outcomes including operative mortality, bleeding complications, need for intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) support, ventilation duration, ICU stay, blood loss, and transfusion requirements were compared.
Main Results:
- Group B (modified UF) had significantly lower operative mortality (0% vs. 17%, p < 0.05) and fewer bleeding complications requiring reoperation (5% vs. 25%, p < 0.05) compared to Group A (CHF).
- Modified UF also led to reduced need for IABP support (5% vs. 25%), shorter long-term ventilation (5% vs. 33%), and decreased ICU stay (10% vs. 41%, p < 0.05).
- Postoperative blood loss (623 ml vs. 1310 ml) and transfusion requirements (3.0 units vs. 9.3 units) were significantly lower in the modified UF group (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Modified ultrafiltration (UF) is a superior renal support strategy compared to continuous hemofiltration (CHF) for dialysis-dependent patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting.
- This approach significantly reduces operative mortality, bleeding complications, and resource utilization.
- Modified UF plays a vital role in improving perioperative outcomes and potentially long-term survival in this vulnerable patient cohort.
Abstract:
Coronary bypass grafting for patients on chronic dialysis has increased the risk of operative mortality, and long-term survival is considered poor. Thirty-three patients dependent on dialysis undergoing coronary bypass grafting were analyzed. The 33 patients were divided into two groups according to the strategy for renal support. In group A, 12 patients underwent continuous hemofiltration (CHF) during and after cardiopulmonary bypass and CHF in an intensive care unit (ICU) and then returned to regular dialysis. In group B, 21 patients underwent modified ultrafiltration (UF) immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass and continuous hemodialysis and filtration in an ICU with early reinstitution of regular dialysis. Two patients died in group A, and there were no operative deaths in group B (17% vs. 0%, p < 0.05). Three patients in group A and one patient in group B had bleeding complications requiring reoperation (25% vs. 5%, p < 0.05). Three patients in group A and one patient in group B needed intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) support postoperatively (25% vs. 5%, p < 0.05). Four patients in group A and one in group B required long-term ventilation of more than 3 days (33% vs. 5%, p < 0.05). There were five patients in group A and two patients in group B requiring long-term ICU stay of more than 4 days (41% vs. 10%, p < 0.05). Postoperative blood loss within 24 hours was 1310 ml in group A and 623 ml in group B (p < 0.05). Transfusion requirements were 9.3 units in group A and 3.0 units in group B (p < 0.05). During follow-up, the long-term survival, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and incidence of recurrent angina were considered favorable in both groups. Cardiac event-free rates after surgery at 1, 3, and 5 years were 88%, 73%, and 67%, respectively. The operative mortality, morbidity, and long-term survival for dialysis dependent patients were reasonably acceptable. As renal support, modified UF can play an important role in reducing bleeding complications, shortening the ICU stay, and decreasing blood loss and transfusion requirements.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis
