Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Reliability of the Cardiff Test of basic life support and automated external defibrillation version 3.1
Richard H Whitfield1, Robert G Newcombe, Malcolm Woollard
1Pre-hospital Emergency Research Unit, Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust, University of Wales College of Medicine, Finance Building, Lansdowne Hospital, Sanatorium Road, Cardiff CF11 8PL, UK. r.whitfield@emergency-research.co.uk
Insights
The Cardiff Test of basic life support (BLS) and automated external defibrillation (AED) demonstrates satisfactory reliability for assessing CPR quality. However, specific variables require further refinement for improved accuracy in BLS and AED performance evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Medical Education
- Resuscitation Science
Background:
- The 2000 European Resuscitation Guidelines necessitated a reliable method for evaluating cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillation (AED) performance.
- Existing assessment methods required an updated, dependable tool to measure CPR and AED quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the Cardiff Test of basic life support (BLS) and AED version 3.1.
- To assess the dependability of a standardized checklist method for evaluating CPR and AED performance using video analysis and manikin data.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from a lay responder AED training program involving 33 datasets.
- Six observers evaluated performance twice, with a minimum 3-week interval, assessing 42 variables.
- Calculated inter- and intra-observer reliability using kappa scores and analyzed time-to-first-shock standard deviations.
Main Results:
- Over 70% of variables showed satisfactory inter-observer reliability (kappa ≥ 0.70) or were computer-derived.
- 85% of variables demonstrated satisfactory intra-observer reliability (kappa ≥ 0.70) or were computer-derived.
- Reliability was less acceptable for specific actions like checking responsiveness, airway management, circulation checks, time to first shock, and intervention sequencing.
Conclusions:
- The Cardiff Test of BLS and AED version 3.1 generally offers satisfactory inter- and intra-observer reliability for CPR and AED performance assessment.
- Further research is needed to enhance the reliability of specific variables within the assessment tool.
- Modifications to the assessment method may be required to improve reliability for certain critical steps in basic life support and defibrillation.
Abstract:
The introduction of the European Resuscitation Guidelines (2000) for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillation (AED) prompted the development of an up-to-date and reliable method of assessing the quality of performance of CPR in combination with the use of an AED. The Cardiff Test of basic life support (BLS) and AED version 3.1 was developed to meet this need and uses standardised checklists to retrospectively evaluate performance from analyses of video recordings and data drawn from a laptop computer attached to a training manikin. This paper reports the inter- and intra-observer reliability of this test. Data used to assess reliability were obtained from an investigation of CPR and AED skill acquisition in a lay responder AED training programme. Six observers were recruited to evaluate performance in 33 data sets, repeating their evaluation after a minimum interval of 3 weeks. More than 70% of the 42 variables considered in this study had a kappa score of 0.70 or above for inter-observer reliability or were drawn from computer data and therefore not subject to evaluator variability. 85% of the 42 variables had kappa scores for intra-observer reliability of 0.70 or above or were drawn from computer data. The standard deviations for inter- and intra-observer measures of time to first shock were 11.6 and 7.7 s, respectively. The inter- and intra-observer reliability for the majority of the variables in the Cardiff Test of BLS and AED version 3.1 is satisfactory. However, reliability is less acceptable with respect to shaking when checking for responsiveness, initial check/clearing of the airway, checks for signs of circulation, time to first shock and performance of interventions in the correct sequence. Further research is required to determine if modifications to the method of assessing these variables can increase reliability.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

