Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026
![Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58641.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Semi-quantitative Assessment Using [18F]FDG Tracer in Patients with Severe Brain Injury
Published on: November 9, 2018
Determination of vital status at the end of the DIG trial
Joseph F Collins1, Cindy L Howell, R Anne Horney
1Department of Veterans Affairs, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center,VA Maryland Healthcare System, Perry Point, Maryland 21902, USA. joseph.collins2@med.va.gov
Insights
The Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial investigated digoxin
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Heart failure affects millions globally, necessitating effective treatments.
- Digoxin is a common medication for heart failure, but its impact on mortality requires clear definition.
- The Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial aimed to resolve uncertainties regarding digoxin's role in heart failure management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the effect of digoxin on total mortality in patients with heart failure.
- To assess whether digoxin provides benefit, harm, or no effect on mortality in this patient population.
- To establish definitive evidence for digoxin's efficacy and safety in heart failure management.
Main Methods:
- A large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
- Inclusion criteria: heart failure, sinus rhythm, ejection fraction ≤0.45.
- Rigorous data collection and closeout procedures to ensure complete vital status data.
Main Results:
- The DIG trial successfully determined the vital status for over 98.8% of participants.
- This high completion rate minimized potential bias from missing data.
- The study design facilitated accurate reporting of outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The DIG trial established a robust methodology for large clinical trials with common end dates.
- The study's success underscores the importance of proactive planning for data acquisition and study closeout.
- Recommendations for future trials emphasize early activation of data collection plans to ensure data completeness.
Abstract:
The Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial was a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial whose primary objective was to determine whether digoxin had beneficial, harmful, or no effect on total mortality in patients with heart failure who were in sinus rhythm and whose ejection fraction was =0.45. The study was designed as a large simple trial with a large number of centers (302) in the United States and Canada, many of which were inexperienced in research. To ensure that the results of the trial would be reported accurately without possible bias due to missing data, the study leadership decided that no outcome results would be reported until the vital status at the end of the study was known for at least 97% of the study participants. Planning for closeout of the study began a year prior to the common end date of December 31, 1995 and included plans for obtaining vital status on December 31, 1995. Participants were given postcards at their final study visit to be completed and mailed on or after January 1, 1996. Of 5602 postcards distributed, 5070 (90.5%) were completed and returned. A contract search agency was hired to locate the remaining participants. Of the total 7788 participants entered into the DIG trial, only 97 participants (1.2%) could not have their vital status as of December 31, 1995 determined. It is recommended that investigators having an outcome measure with a common end date include plans in their protocols for obtaining their measures and activate those plans as early as possible during the course of the study.

