Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Interplay of transcriptomics and proteomics.

Priti S Hegde¹, Ian R White, Christine Debouck

¹Department of Transcriptome Analysis, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceutical Research & Development, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.

Current Opinion in Biotechnology

|December 10, 2003

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

European Society of Contact Dermatitis Guideline for Diagnostic Patch Testing-Recommendations on Best Practice (Update 2026).

Contact dermatitis·2026

Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026

Same author

Sample Size Calculation for the ROCI Design.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same author

Bayesian analysis in confirmatory clinical trials: A narrative review and discussion of current practice.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026

Same author

Adjusting for confounding in population administrative data when confounders are only measured in a linked cohort.

International journal of population data science·2026

Same author

An investigation of the impact of using contrast- and arm-synthesis models for network meta-analysis.

Research synthesis methods·2026

Same journal

Microbial C1 assimilation pathways for chemical synthesis: from native metabolism to synthetic design.

Current opinion in biotechnology·2026

Same journal

Medicinal plants fermentation: current knowledge and perspectives.

Current opinion in biotechnology·2026

Same journal

Fermented foods: lessons learned from metagenomics.

Current opinion in biotechnology·2026

Same journal

Microfluidic platforms for the transient transfection of mammalian cells: recent developments and challenges.

Current opinion in biotechnology·2026

Same journal

Harvesting insights from recent advances in yeast genomics for predictable and precision wine fermentation.

Current opinion in biotechnology·2026

Same journal

Minimal enzyme cascades for the aromatic-to-aromatic upgrading of lignin monomers.

Current opinion in biotechnology·2026

See all related articles

Global transcriptomics and proteomics offer powerful insights but face practical challenges. Careful study design is crucial for comparing these omics data, with future work addressing splicing, modifications, and integration.

Area of Science:

Biochemistry
Molecular Biology
Genomics

Background:

Global omics profiling, combining transcriptomics and proteomics, is attractive for comprehensive biological analysis.
Significant practical and biological differences exist between transcriptomic and proteomic analyses.
Transcriptomics is a mature, high-throughput technology for quantifying mRNA species.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight the differences and similarities between transcriptomics and proteomics.
To discuss the challenges and considerations for comparing transcriptomic and proteomic data.
To identify future research directions in multi-omics integration.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of transcriptomic and proteomic methodologies.
Discussion of inherent limitations in proteomic coverage (abundance, stability, etc.).

Related Experiment Videos

Consideration of experimental design for integrated omics studies.

Main Results:

Transcriptomics offers broad, cost-effective, and automated quantification of mRNA.
Proteomics faces limitations in coverage due to protein variability.
Successful comparison of transcriptomic and proteomic data requires careful design and interpretation.

Conclusions:

Despite challenges, integrating transcriptomic and proteomic data is feasible with appropriate study design.
Future research should focus on addressing differential splicing, post-translational modifications, and robust data integration.
Advancements in proteomics are needed to match the breadth and depth of transcriptomics.