Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors.

Douglas G Tincello1, Abimbola Williams, Gillian E Fowler

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, UK.

BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
|December 11, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Healthcare resource utilization comparing single-use ureteroscopes with real-time intrarenal pressure monitoring to other single-use ureteroscopes.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada·2026
Same author

Placental Growth Factor Led Management of the Small for Gestational Age Fetus: Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2025
Same author

INSPECT-SR: a tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of detailed anomaly ultrasound screening in the first trimester: a mixed-methods study.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2025
Same author

The impact of Cochrane Reviews that apply network meta-analysis in clinical guidelines: A systematic review.

PloS one·2024
Same author

FERN: is it possible to conduct a randomised controlled trial of intervention or expectant management for early-onset selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancy - protocol for a prospective multicentre mixed-methods feasibility study.

BMJ open·2024

Doctors and midwives differ in episiotomy practices, with doctors drawing longer, more angled incisions. These variations in episiotomy technique may increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries during childbirth.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Surgical Procedures
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Episiotomy is a surgical procedure during childbirth.
  • Variations in episiotomy technique may impact maternal outcomes.
  • Understanding practice differences is crucial for standardizing care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine episiotomy practices among healthcare professionals.
  • To identify differences in episiotomy techniques between doctors and midwives.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective survey using a validated pictorial questionnaire.
  • Study conducted in a tertiary referral obstetric hospital and a district general hospital.
  • Data collected on episiotomy length, distance from midline, and angle from the sagittal plane.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant differences observed in episiotomy length and angle between doctors and midwives.
  • Doctors' episiotomies were longer and more angled than midwives'.
  • Higher rates of longer episiotomies among doctors and shallower angles among midwives were reported.

Conclusions:

  • This study highlights distinct episiotomy practices between doctors and midwives.
  • Reported differences in technique may theoretically increase anal sphincter injury risk.
  • Further observational and mechanical studies are needed to confirm findings and investigate injury mechanisms.