Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Long-Term Catheterization of the Intestinal Lymph Trunk and Collection of Lymph in Neonatal Pigs
Published on: March 5, 2016
Peritoneal drainage as definitive management of intestinal perforation in extremely low-birth-weight infants
Gerald Gollin1, Aaron Abarbanell, Joanne E Baerg
1Division of Pediatric Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine and Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Insights
Peritoneal drainage (PD) for extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants with intestinal perforation offers comparable survival to laparotomy. However, this approach leads to delayed enteral feeding and significant infectious complications and cholestasis.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Surgery
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Intestinal perforation in extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants presents management challenges.
- Optimal therapeutic strategies for ELBW infants with intestinal perforation are not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of peritoneal drainage (PD) as definitive therapy for intestinal perforation in ELBW neonates.
- To compare PD outcomes with those of immediate laparotomy and resection.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 29 consecutive ELBW infants undergoing PD for intestinal perforation.
- Assessment of survival rates, need for secondary abdominal procedures, time to enteral feeding, and incidence of cholestasis and infectious complications.
- Analysis of variables associated with nonsurvival.
Main Results:
- Overall survival rate was 66%.
- 24% of infants required a second abdominal procedure.
- Full enteral feeding was achieved at a mean of 69 days.
- 63% of survivors experienced extra-abdominal infectious complications; 57% had elevated direct bilirubin at 2 months.
Conclusions:
- Peritoneal drainage (PD) as definitive treatment for intestinal perforation in ELBW infants yields survival rates comparable to laparotomy.
- PD requires few secondary abdominal procedures but is associated with prolonged time to full enteral nutrition.
- A substantial incidence of non-abdominal infectious complications and cholestasis was observed.
Background/Purpose:
The optimal management of extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants with intestinal perforation remains unclear. The authors evaluated ELBW neonates with intestinal perforation in whom peritoneal drainage (PD) was intended as definitive therapy.
Methods:
The records of 29 consecutive ELBW infants with intestinal perforation were reviewed. All underwent PD. Survival, the need for other abdominal procedures, the transition to enteral feeding, and the incidence of cholestasis and infectious complications were noted. Variables associated with nonsurvival were assessed.
Results:
Overall survival rate was 66%. In 24% of cases, a second abdominal procedure was required. Full feedings were achieved at a mean of 69 days. Extraabdominal infectious complications occurred in 63% of survivors, and direct bilirubin was greater than 2.0 mg/dL in 57% at 2 months. Thrombocytopenia and vasopressor requirements at the time of perforation were associated with nonsurvival.
Conclusions:
In this consecutive series of ELBW infants in whom PD was intended as definitive treatment for intestinal perforation survival was comparable with that found in series in which immediate laparotomy and resection were used. Few secondary abdominal procedures were required. The interval between PD and full enteral nutrition, however, was long, and the incidence of nonabdominal infectious complications and cholestasis was substantial.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Intestinal Obstruction II: Pathophysiology
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus.