Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
Comparison of the centrifugal and roller pump in elective coronary artery bypass surgery--a prospective, randomized
Knut S Andersen1, Else L Nygreen, Ketil Grong
1Department of Heart Disease, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. knut.s.andersen@helse-bergen.no
Insights
Roller pumps significantly increase platelet aggregation after coronary artery bypass surgery compared to centrifugal pumps, suggesting a higher risk of blood clots. No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes or hemolysis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Hematology
Background:
- Cardiopulmonary bypass is essential for coronary artery bypass surgery.
- The type of pump used may influence patient outcomes.
- Platelet function and hemolysis are critical parameters during bypass.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of centrifugal pumps versus roller pumps on platelet function.
- To evaluate the impact on hemolysis and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.
Main Methods:
- Randomized controlled trial involving 34 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery.
- Platelet activation assessed via flow cytometry pre-operatively, during bypass, and up to 3 days post-operatively.
- Comparison of outcomes including bypass duration, ischemic time, hospital stay, and mortality.
Main Results:
- Roller pump use led to a significant 250% increase in platelet aggregates post-operatively, with a further fivefold increase by day 3 (p < 0.001).
- Centrifugal pump use did not result in significant changes in platelet aggregation.
- Hemolysis showed a transient 20% increase post-bypass in both groups, resolving by the next day without significant group differences.
- No significant differences were found in bypass duration, ischemic period, hospital stay, or mortality between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Roller pumps induce significantly higher platelet aggregation compared to centrifugal pumps, suggesting increased risk for postoperative thrombotic complications.
- Current evidence does not support the clinical superiority of centrifugal pumps over roller pumps in terms of hemolysis or overall clinical outcomes for this procedure.
Abstract:
Objective--Evaluation of the centrifugal pump vs roller pump concerning effects upon platelet function, hemolysis and clinical outcome in elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Design--Thirty-four patients were randomized to centrifugal or roller pump. Platelet activation was studied by flow cytometry before, during and up to 3 days after bypass. Results--Duration of bypass, ischemic period, peripheral anastomoses, hospital stay and mortality did not differ. In roller pump patients, platelet aggregates increased by 250% between end of bypass and 3 h postoperatively (p < 0.001). A secondary, fivefold increase in number of platelet aggregates was found on the 3rd postoperative day (p < 0.001). In the centrifugal pump group, these changes were not significant. Hemolysis increased (20%) at end of bypass and 3 h postoperatively (p < 0.005), and decreased to preoperative levels the next day without group difference. Conclusion--Platelet aggregation was significantly increased in roller compared with centrifugal pump patients, indicating higher susceptibility to postoperative thrombotic complications with the roller pump. Otherwise, there was no clinical evidence for superiority of the centrifugal pump.

