Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning styles: self-reports versus thinking-aloud measures.

Marcel V J Veenman1, Frans J Prins, Joke Verheij

  • 1Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Leiden University, The Netherlands. Veenman@fsw.leidenuniv.nl

The British Journal of Educational Psychology
|December 16, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to: Pitfalls in the genetic testing of the OPN1LW-OPN1MW gene cluster in human subjects.

NPJ genomic medicine·2024
Same author

Diagnostic analysis of the highly complex OPN1LW/OPN1MW gene cluster using long-read sequencing and MLPA.

NPJ genomic medicine·2022
Same author

Parental experiences of rapid exome sequencing in cases with major ultrasound anomalies during pregnancy.

Prenatal diagnosis·2021
Same author

A novel undergraduate biomedical laboratory course concept in synergy with ongoing faculty research.

Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology·2021
Same author

Is there still a role for nuchal translucency measurement in the changing paradigm of first trimester screening?

Prenatal diagnosis·2019
Same author

Balanced into array: genome-wide array analysis in 54 patients with an apparently balanced de novo chromosome rearrangement and a meta-analysis.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2011

Self-report learning style questionnaires like the Inventory of Learning Styles (ILS) are weak predictors of student success. Actual study process measures are more effective for identifying at-risk students and confirming learning style theory.

Area of Science:

  • Educational Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Student learning styles are commonly assessed using self-report inventories, such as Vermunt's Inventory of Learning Styles (ILS).
  • Concerns exist regarding the reliability and validity of self-report questionnaires for accurately measuring learning styles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate different learning style assessment methods for identifying students at risk of academic difficulty.
  • To compare the efficacy of the ILS self-report instrument against direct assessment of students' study processes.

Main Methods:

  • Administered the ILS to 1,060 students and collected academic data (GPA, credit points).
  • Selected 33 students for a second study involving a think-aloud protocol while reading a technical text.
  • Analyzed think-aloud protocols for study activities (process measures) and assessed knowledge acquisition via post-test.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The ILS demonstrated poor predictive power for student academic outcomes in the initial study.
  • Minimal correlation was found between ILS scores and observed study process measures in the second study.
  • Study process measures significantly outperformed the ILS in predicting academic results (post-test, GPA, credit points).

Conclusions:

  • Findings support learning style theory when assessed through actual study behaviors.
  • The use of self-report instruments like the ILS for learning style assessment warrants critical re-evaluation.
  • Direct observation of study processes offers a more robust method for understanding and supporting student learning.