Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

06:00
Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
Published on: October 1, 2011
Brain size scaling and body composition in mammals
1Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. ptschoen@sas.upenn.edu
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
|December 16, 2003
Summary
Mammalian brain size correlates more closely with lean body mass than with fat. This finding suggests lean mass, not overall body weight, better explains brain size scaling across species.
Area of Science:
- Comparative biology
- Neuroscience
- Mammalian physiology
Background:
- Brain size generally scales with body size across animal taxa.
- The underlying biological factors driving this scaling relationship remain debated.
- Existing hypotheses link body size to metabolic resources, surface area, or muscle mass.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether mammalian brain size scales more closely with lean body mass or fat mass.
- To identify a more appropriate scaling parameter for brain size across species.
Main Methods:
- Utilized organ weight data from 39 mammal species across 8 orders.
- Employed Felsenstein's independent contrasts method to account for phylogenetic effects.
- Analyzed the relationship between central nervous system (CNS) size and components of body composition (lean vs. fat mass).
Main Results:
- Central nervous system (CNS) size showed a stronger association with fat-free body weight compared to fat weight.
- Lean body mass components were more closely linked to brain size than fat mass.
- This supports the hypothesis that metabolic resources, related to lean mass, influence brain size.
Conclusions:
- Lean body mass is a more suitable parameter than total body weight for scaling brain size across mammalian species.
- The findings offer a potential explanation for the shared scaling relationship between metabolic resources and brain size.
- This research refines our understanding of the biological drivers of brain size evolution.

