Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Method-specific variance in the implicit association test.

Jan Mierke1, Karl Christoph Klauer

  • 1Psychological Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. jan.mierke@uni-bonn.de

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|December 17, 2003
PubMed
Summary

The Implicit Association Test (IAT) reveals reliable individual differences, but these are specific to the method used, not the content measured. New scoring methods, like the D measures, effectively reduce this method-specific variance.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The disputed role of knowledge in truth illusions: A critical test based on comparative judgments.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Cognitive processes underlying the repetition-based truth effect: A diffusion model study.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

All types of recognition errors are (at least partly) attributable to misleading memory evidence, even false alarms.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Comment on: Probabilities of conditionals: The relevance effect might be confounded by the existence of boundary cases (2025) by Zhan and Wang.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Modeling truncated and censored data with the diffusion model in Stan.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Rethinking Knowledge's Impact on the Illusory Truth Effect.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025

Area of Science:

  • Psychological Measurement
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures implicit biases by assessing the strength of associative links.
  • Understanding method-specific variance is crucial for accurate interpretation of IAT results.
  • Previous IAT scoring methods may be influenced by factors unrelated to true associations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the extent of method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
  • To determine if IAT effects reflect genuine associations or are influenced by the testing procedure.
  • To evaluate techniques for reducing method-specific variance in IAT scores.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted to analyze IAT data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study examined conventionally scored IAT effects and compared them with alternative scoring methods.
  • The presence of IAT effects without pre-existing associations between response categories was investigated.

    • Main Results:

    • Conventionally scored IAT effects contain reliable individual differences.
    • These differences are specific to the measurement method, not the content being assessed.
    • IAT effects can emerge even without a prior association between response categories.

    Conclusions:

    • IAT results are influenced by method-specific variance, independent of the measured content.
    • The D measures proposed by Greenwald, Nosek, and Banaji (2003) are effective in reducing method-specific variance.
    • Refined scoring techniques are necessary for more accurate assessments of implicit associations using the IAT.