Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

For public or profession?--The new GMC performance procedures.

M Stacey1

  • 1Department of Sociology, University of Warwick, Coventry.

BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
|October 31, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electrical stimulation directs articular chondrocyte and chondrosarcoma migration in a 3D collagen matrix.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2025
Same author

The impact of deicer and anti-icer use on plant communities in stormwater detention basins: Characterizing salt stress and phytoremediation potential.

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

Validation of dried blood spot sampling for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and total immunoglobulins in a large cohort of asymptomatic young adults.

Journal of immunological methods·2023
Same author

Awake tracheal intubation.

BJA education·2022
Same author

Procedure for assessing patients referred to the UK's military Heat Illness Clinic: a case series.

BMJ military health·2021
Same author

The use of routine blood tests to assist the diagnosis of COVID-19 in symptomatic hospitalized patients.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2021

The General Medical Council is proposing new peer-led performance procedures for underperforming doctors. These reforms aim to enhance self-regulation within the medical profession, addressing past criticisms of disciplinary processes.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Regulation
  • Professional Self-Governance
  • Healthcare Ethics

Background:

  • The General Medical Council (GMC) faced upheaval originating from physicians, not the public it serves.
  • Persistent calls for enhanced physician self-regulation through revised disciplinary procedures have been made.
  • Previous legislative attempts via private member's bills to reform GMC procedures have been unsuccessful.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the proposed performance procedures by the General Medical Council for addressing doctors with a pattern of poor performance.
  • To analyze the implications of peer-led inquiries as a new disciplinary mechanism within medical self-regulation.
  • To assess the clarity and transparency of the proposed GMC performance procedures.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of proposed General Medical Council (GMC) performance procedures.
  • Review of consultation feedback from within and outside the medical profession.
  • Examination of the shift from conduct hearings to peer-led inquiries for performance issues.

    • Main Results:

    • The GMC has proposed new performance procedures to manage doctors exhibiting a pattern of poor performance.
    • These procedures are designed as peer inquiries, differing from traditional conduct hearings.
    • Concerns have been raised regarding the clarity and transparency of the proposed "trust me" approach.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed GMC performance procedures represent a significant shift towards peer-led evaluation of underperforming physicians.
    • The effectiveness and transparency of these new disciplinary mechanisms require careful consideration.
    • Further scrutiny is needed to ensure the proposed procedures are clear, accountable, and uphold public trust in medical self-regulation.