Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Dollars Needed to Pay per Early-Detected Colorectal Cancer Case in Stool-Based Screening.

Annals of internal medicine·2026

Same author

No-cost envelope modification improves fecal immunochemical test laboratory acceptance in a US Veterans Affairs colorectal cancer screening trial.

Journal of medical screening·2026

Same author

Neoplasia outcomes following colonoscopy for Lynch syndrome at a dedicated center vs. community centers.

Endoscopy international open·2026

Same author

In adults aged 45 to 49 y, active screening choices via patient portal reduced screening rates vs. mailed FIT at 6 mo.

Annals of internal medicine·2025

Same author

Extracellular vesicle and particle-based blood test for ovarian cancer screening of average risk population: a promising nested case control study using preclinical samples.

Gynecologic oncology·2025

Same author

Initial-Care Medical and Prescription Costs for Incident Metastatic versus Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Cancer research communications·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 17, 2013

Using risk for advanced proximal colonic neoplasia to tailor endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer.

Thomas F Imperiale¹, David R Wagner, Ching Y Lin

¹Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Annals of Internal Medicine

|December 18, 2003

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new clinical index helps identify individuals at very low risk for advanced proximal neoplasia, potentially reducing the need for colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. This tool aids in tailoring endoscopic screening strategies.

More Related Videos

Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Published on: February 16, 2024

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists

Published on: July 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 17, 2013

Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Published on: February 16, 2024

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists

Published on: July 11, 2025

Area of Science:

Gastroenterology
Oncology
Preventive Medicine

Background:

Sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer misses a significant number of advanced proximal neoplasias.
Colonoscopic screening is more comprehensive but resource-intensive.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a clinical index for stratifying risk of advanced proximal neoplasia.
To identify a low-risk subgroup suitable for less intensive screening.

Main Methods:

A cross-sectional study involving 1994 participants undergoing initial screening colonoscopy.
A 3-variable clinical index (age, sex, distal findings) was created and validated on 1031 additional participants.
Risk for advanced proximal neoplasia (adenoma ≥1 cm, villous histology, severe dysplasia, or cancer) was assessed.

Main Results:

The index identified a low-risk subgroup (37-47% of participants) with a very low risk of advanced proximal neoplasia (0.4%-0.68%).
The index detected 92% of advanced proximal neoplasms.
Applying the index could reduce colonoscopy needs by 40% by identifying individuals for whom sigmoidoscopy alone might suffice.

Conclusions:

The developed clinical index effectively stratifies risk for advanced proximal neoplasia.
This tool can identify a very low-risk subgroup, potentially optimizing colorectal cancer screening strategies.
Further validation in diverse populations is recommended for broader application in tailoring endoscopic screening.