Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Troubles with bubbles.

Richard F Murray1, Jason M Gold

  • 1Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78712-0187, USA. murray@psych.upenn.edu

Vision Research
|December 19, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Light and shape in the work of Robert Fones.

i-Perception·2026
Same author

A model of the Unity High-Definition Render Pipeline, with applications to flat-panel and head-mounted display characterization.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

A deep convolutional neural network trained for lightness constancy is susceptible to lightness illusions.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Deep neural networks trained for estimating reflectance and illumination achieve lightness constancy differently than human observers.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

An equivalent illuminant analysis of lightness constancy with physical objects and in virtual reality.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

An edge-simplicity bias in the visual input to young infants.

Science advances·2024
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

The bubbles method, a variant of reverse correlation, recovers less information about stimulus processing in noisy linear observers. Its unique noise can alter human strategies, reducing experimental value compared to traditional reverse correlation.

Area of Science:

  • Psychophysics
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Sensory Processing

Background:

  • The bubbles method is a recent variant of established reverse correlation techniques used in psychophysics and physiology.
  • Reverse correlation methods are widely employed to infer how observers process sensory information.

Discussion:

  • Mathematical analysis reveals the bubbles method recovers significantly less information for noisy linear observers compared to standard reverse correlation.
  • Experimental findings indicate that the specific noise characteristics in the bubbles method can substantially influence human observer strategies in psychophysical tasks.
  • This strategic alteration by the bubbles method's noise compromises the fidelity and interpretability of the obtained experimental data.

Key Insights:

  • The bubbles method is mathematically and experimentally shown to be less informative than traditional reverse correlation for noisy linear observers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The unusual noise in the bubbles method can lead to suboptimal or altered observer strategies, diminishing the method's utility.
  • Reverse correlation generally offers a more robust approach for understanding stimulus processing mechanisms.

    • Outlook:

    • Future modifications to the bubbles method could potentially address the identified limitations regarding noise and information recovery.
    • Further research may explore alternative noise structures or analytical approaches to enhance the bubbles method's effectiveness.
    • Comparative studies will continue to refine the application of reverse correlation techniques in understanding perception and cognition.