Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Issues to consider when attempting to achieve the American Diabetes Association clinical quality requirement for
Patrick J Twomey1, Anthony S Wierzbicki, Timothy M Reynolds
1Specialist Registrar in Clinical Biochemistry, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK. p.twomey@ed.ac.uk
Insights
Clinicians must understand haemoglobin A1c (A1C) test limitations, including intra-individual variation, which impacts diabetes management. More frequent A1C monitoring and laboratory quality controls are recommended for precise glycaemic control assessment.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Endocrinology
- Diabetes Mellitus Research
Background:
- Diabetes mellitus management relies on monitoring glycaemic control using haemoglobin A1c (A1C).
- Understanding A1C measurement limitations is crucial for effective clinical practice.
- Current guidelines from the American Diabetes Association emphasize A1C's role but require awareness of its variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To elucidate the limitations of haemoglobin A1c (A1C) testing in diabetes mellitus management.
- To highlight the impact of analytical and biological variation on A1C results.
- To provide recommendations for improving the precision and reliability of A1C monitoring.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on A1C measurement variability.
- Analysis of factors contributing to bias, including DCCT-aligned methods.
- Discussion of intra-individual variation as a primary source of A1C fluctuation.
Main Results:
- Intra-individual variation is identified as the principal factor affecting A1C results in stable patients.
- Bias between DCCT-aligned methods and analytical variation also contribute to A1C measurement uncertainty.
- Frequent A1C monitoring may be necessary to achieve precise glycaemic control assessment.
Conclusions:
- Clinicians need a deeper understanding of A1C test limitations for optimal diabetes care.
- Laboratories should implement robust quality control measures, including internal quality control and 'Delta check' criteria.
- Adherence to enhanced quality assurance procedures will improve the accuracy of A1C results for clinical decision-making and audits.
Abstract:
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that is monitored by measurement of haemoglobin A1c (A1C) as an index of glycaemic control. The limitations of using A1C, given the consensus clinical practice recommendations made by the American Diabetes Association, need to be better understood by clinicians. These include bias between DCCT-aligned methods, analytical variation and intra-individual variation. As intra-individual variation is the principal factor determining variation in A1C in rolling means of the last four A1C results and to stable patients, clinicians may need to monitor A1C more frequently to achieve precise results. Laboratories need to report current values and the analyse six internal quality control specimens for each analytical run. 'Delta check' criteria ought to be applied and results reported to highlight acute deviations in A1C. Such procedures will aid the attainment of the clinical quality requirements and give appropriate results for audit purposes.
Related Concept Videos
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Hyperglycemia
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...