Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2026

Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
Published on: July 24, 2013
How should we measure social disadvantage in clinic settings?
D M Foreman1, D Foreman, E B Minty
1Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, Skimped Hill Health Centre, Market Square, Bracknell RG12 1LH, UK.
Background:
Despite a large research literature supporting their validity, deprivation indices derived from census data have not been routinely applied to clinic populations.
Method:
A case-note sample of 201 cases was examined, to identify whether such data (Jarman indices) predicted presenting disability separately from diagnostic class (behaviour, emotional, mixed, other, and no diagnosable disorder), or conventional clinic measures of social adversity (ICD-10 psychosocial diagnostic codes).
Results:
Jarman index scores predicted disability in behaviour disorders or other disorders. Conventional clinic measures of adversity predicted disability in mixed disorders. For emotional disorders, and those cases with no diagnosed disorder, clinically measured adversity and Jarman scores interacted.
Conclusions:
Postcode related census data capture information about clinic children's presenting disability that is not available from routine clinic assessment of psychosocial adversity. It should therefore be collected as part of the routine clinical child psychiatry assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Social Facilitation
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison

