Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing traditional and integrative learning methods in organizational training programs.

R D Bretz1, R E Thompsett

  • 1Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University 14853-3901.

The Journal of Applied Psychology
|December 11, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Job and life attitudes of male executives.

The Journal of applied psychologyยท1994
See all related articles

Integrative-learning-based training improved employee satisfaction and learning outcomes compared to traditional methods. Both training types significantly enhanced performance over no training.

Area of Science:

  • Educational Psychology
  • Workplace Training & Development
  • Human Resource Management

Background:

  • Previous studies suggest certain teaching methods enhance learning and satisfaction.
  • Anecdotal evidence supports the benefits of varied instructional approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of integrative-learning-based (IL) training against traditional lecture-based training.
  • To evaluate employee satisfaction and performance outcomes associated with different training methodologies.

Main Methods:

  • A 3-day manufacturing resource planning training course was utilized.
  • Employees were randomly assigned to either IL or traditional lecture-based training groups.
  • A no-treatment control group was included for comparison.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Employees reported more favorable reactions to IL-based training.
  • Both IL and traditional training groups showed significant performance improvements compared to the control group.
  • No significant performance differences were observed between the IL and traditional training groups.

Conclusions:

  • Integrative-learning-based training is well-received by employees.
  • Both training methods effectively improve job-related performance.
  • Further research may explore specific IL components influencing outcomes.