Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Regression models for relative survival.

Paul W Dickman1, Andy Sloggett, Michael Hills

  • 1Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. paul.dickman@mep.ki.se

Statistics in Medicine
|December 26, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ASO Visual Abstract: Socioeconomic Status and Survival in Sarcomas of the Breast: Nationwide Cohort Study.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Socioeconomic Status and Survival in Sarcomas of the Breast: Nationwide Cohort Study.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Risk of Transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Over Attained Age and Time Since Diagnosis: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

European journal of haematology·2026
Same author

Empirical and projected economic burden of chronic myeloid leukaemia in Sweden from 2015 to 2030: A population-based study.

British journal of haematology·2025
Same author

Body height and the excess cancer risk in men.

International journal of cancer·2025
Same author

Local recurrence of phyllodes tumors after surgery with wide compared to narrow margins: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Systematic reviews·2025

Four maximum likelihood methods for relative survival regression were compared. A generalized linear model with Poisson errors is recommended for its ease of use and software availability in cancer survival analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Survival Analysis

Background:

  • Relative survival analysis is crucial for cancer research.
  • Estimating regression models for relative survival presents methodological challenges.
  • The additive hazards model provides a framework for understanding excess mortality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare four maximum likelihood estimation approaches for relative survival regression.
  • To identify the most practical and reliable method for estimating excess hazard models.
  • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate statistical software for relative survival analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Description and comparison of four maximum likelihood estimation methods.
  • Application of an additive hazards model with constant excess hazards within follow-up bands.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing generalized linear models (GLMs) for likelihood maximization.
  • Analysis of two real-world cancer patient datasets.

    • Main Results:

    • All four methods produced highly similar relative survival estimates.
    • Estimates remained consistent even when the proportional excess hazards assumption was violated.
    • Generalized linear models (GLMs) offer a flexible and accessible approach.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of method can be based on software availability and ease of implementation.
    • Recommends using a GLM with a Poisson error structure on collapsed data with exact survival times.
    • This approach is supported by widely available statistical software and GLM theory for diagnostics.