Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

An Open-Source Normothermic Perfusion System Designed for Research Scientists
Published on: July 18, 2025
Cost analysis of blood purification in intensive care units: continuous versus intermittent hemodiafiltration
Corrado Vitale1, Cristiana Bagnis, Martino Marangella
1Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Renal Stone Centre, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy. covitale@libero.it
Insights
Implementing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in ICUs, involving collaboration between dialysis and ICU staff, resulted in a 12% higher cost than intermittent hemodiafiltration (IHDF) primarily due to device expenses.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Intensive Care Medicine
- Healthcare Management
Background:
- Continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) require specialized programs within intensive care units (ICUs).
- Effective implementation relies on cooperative efforts between dialysis and ICU personnel.
- Comparing CRRT costs with intermittent hemodiafiltration (IHDF) is crucial for resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To detail the implementation of a CRRT program in ICUs.
- To compare the costs of CRRT with IHDF.
- To assess the impact of interdisciplinary collaboration on resource utilization.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 181 ICU patients with renal failure.
- CRRT was conducted as continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) over 24 hours daily, with shared nursing surveillance.
- Intermittent hemodiafiltration (IHDF) was performed by dialysis nurses for 4 hours daily.
Main Results:
- The daily cost of CRRT was €276.70 (79% devices, 21% human resources).
- The daily cost of IHDF was €247.83 (44% devices, 56% human resources).
- CRRT expenditure was 12% higher than IHDF, mainly due to higher device costs.
Conclusions:
- Cooperative dialysis and ICU programs enhance human resource utilization.
- CRRT implementation enabled treatment for all critically ill patients with acute renal failure.
- Despite higher costs, CRRT facilitated comprehensive care for acute renal failure in critically ill patients.
Background:
We implemented a program for continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) in intensive care units (ICU) based on the cooperative work of dialysis and ICU personnel. Our aim was to report the main details of this program and compare its cost with that of intermittent hemodiafiltration (IHDF).
Methods:
The study referred to 181 ICU patients with renal failure. We considered the costs of both technical devices and assisting personnel. CRRT was performed as continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) (24 hr daily); dialysis and ICU nurses shared surveillance. Only dialysis nurses performed IHDF (as acetate-free biofiltration, 4 hr daily) in the ICU.
Results:
The daily cost of CRRT was Euro 276.70; of which 79% was for devices and 21% was for human resources. Nurse surveillance required 141 min per day, ICU nurses supplied 55% (77 min) and dialysis nurses 45% (64 min). On average, CRRT surveillance required less than 1 min/nurse/hr for both dialysis and ICU nurses. The daily cost of 4-hr IHDF sessions of was Euro 247.83, of which 44% was for technical devices and 56% was for human resources.
Conclusions:
The cooperation between dialysis and ICUs improved the use of human resources and allowed us to supply CRRT to all critically ill patients with acute renal failure. The expenditure for CRRT was 12% higher than that for IHDF, due to the cost of technical devices.
Related Concept Videos
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications