Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Implantation of Electroencephalogram and Electrocardiogram Telemetry Devices in Neonatal Rabbit Kits
Published on: February 28, 2025
Superiority of pentobarbital versus chloral hydrate for sedation in infants during imaging
Keira P Mason1, Pamela Sanborn, David Zurakowski
1Department of Anesthesia, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA. keira.mason@tch.harvard.edu
Insights
Pentobarbital and chloral hydrate are equally effective for sedating infants for MRI and CT scans. However, pentobarbital showed a significantly lower incidence of adverse events and oxygen desaturation compared to chloral hydrate.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric imaging
- Pharmacology
- Radiology
Background:
- Sedation is crucial for pediatric imaging procedures like MRI and CT.
- Oral medications are preferred for infant sedation due to ease of administration.
- Comparing sedative agents is essential for optimizing patient safety and procedural success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and safety of oral pentobarbital versus oral chloral hydrate for sedating infants under one year old.
- To evaluate sedation and discharge times, as well as adverse events associated with each agent.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 1,316 infants receiving oral pentobarbital or chloral hydrate for sedation between 1997 and 2002.
- Statistical analysis using Student t test for sedation and discharge times.
- Fisher exact test and logistic regression for adverse event rates.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in mean time to sedation or discharge between pentobarbital and chloral hydrate groups.
- Oral pentobarbital demonstrated a significantly lower overall adverse event rate (0.5%) compared to chloral hydrate (2.7%).
- Fewer episodes of oxygen desaturation were observed with pentobarbital (0.2%) versus chloral hydrate (1.6%).
Conclusions:
- Both oral pentobarbital and chloral hydrate are equally effective for infant sedation during imaging.
- Pentobarbital is associated with a significantly reduced incidence of adverse events, including oxygen desaturation.
Purpose:
To compare the effectiveness and safety of oral pentobarbital and oral chloral hydrate for sedation in infants younger than 1 year during magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT).
Materials And Methods:
A computerized database was used to collect information about all cases in which sedation was used. Outcomes of all infants who received oral pentobarbital or oral chloral hydrate for sedation between 1997 and 2002 were reviewed. Two study groups were compared for sedation and discharge times by using Student t test and for adverse events by using Fisher exact test and multiple logistic regression analysis.
Results:
Infants (n = 1,316) received an oral medication for sedation. Mean doses were 50 mg/kg chloral hydrate and 4 mg/kg pentobarbital. Student t test demonstrated no difference in mean time to sedation and in time to discharge between groups. Overall adverse event rate during sedation was lower with pentobarbital (0.5%) than with chloral hydrate (2.7%) (P <.001). There were fewer episodes of oxygen desaturation with pentobarbital (0.2%) than with chloral hydrate (1.6%) (P <.01). Both medications were equally effective in providing successful sedation.
Conclusion:
Although oral pentobarbital and oral chloral hydrate are equally effective, the incidence of adverse events with pentobarbital was significantly reduced.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Stages of General Anesthesia
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
