Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
Published on: November 30, 2022
Determining the effectiveness of the usability problem inspector: a theory-based model and tool for finding usability
Terence S Andre1, H Rex Hartson, Robert C Williges
1Department of Behavioral Sciences and Leadership, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80840-6228, USA. terence.andre@usafa.af.mil
Abstract:
Despite the increased focus on usability and on the processes and methods used to increase usability, a substantial amount of software is unusable and poorly designed. Much of this is attributable to the lack of cost-effective usability evaluation tools that provide an interaction-based framework for identifying problems. We developed the user action framework and a corresponding evaluation tool, the usability problem inspector (UPI), to help organize usability concepts and issues into a knowledge base. We conducted a comprehensive comparison study to determine if our theory-based framework and tool could be effectively used to find important usability problems in an interface design, relative to two other established inspection methods (heuristic evaluation and cognitive walkthrough). Results showed that the UPI scored higher than heuristic evaluation in terms of thoroughness, validity, and effectiveness and was consistent with cognitive walkthrough for these same measures. We also discuss other potential advantages of the UPI over heuristic evaluation and cognitive walkthrough when applied in practice. Potential applications of this work include a cost-effective alternative or supplement to lab-based formative usability evaluation during any stage of development.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in situations...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
The Availability Heuristic
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
