Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
Published on: November 14, 2018
Mark M Kishiyama1, Andrew P Yonelinas
1Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA. mmkishiyama@ucdavis.edu
Abstract:
Recognition memory is better for novel or distinctive items than for non-novel items. However, it is not known whether these effects reflect changes in recollection or in familiarity-based recognition judgments. Some previous results have indicated that recollection should be more sensitive to novelty than to familiarity, whereas other results have suggested the opposite. We used avon Restorff paradigm in which a small proportion of studied items were made novel by presenting them in a color different from that of the majority of the study items. Memory was tested using a remember-know procedure. Across two experiments, stimulus novelty was found to benefit both recollection and familiarity. The effects on familiarity were observed under intentional and incidental encoding conditions, whereas the effects on recollection were significantly reduced, and no longer significant, under incidental as compared with intentional encoding conditions. Thus, both processes benefit from stimulus novelty, but the extent to which recollection benefits from novelty depends on the encoding condition.
Related Concept Videos
Serial Position Effect
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...

