Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

National biometry audit.

R P Gale1, N Saha, R L Johnston

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

Eye (London, England)
|January 7, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) induced impairment of in vitro pollen performance of Peltophorum pterocarpum (DC.) K. Heyne.

Ecotoxicology (London, England)·2019
Same author

The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database Study of cataract surgery. Report 5: Clinical outcome and risk factors for posterior capsule rupture and visual acuity loss following cataract surgery in patients aged 90 years and older.

Eye (London, England)·2019
Same author

Combining molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies for modelling Staphylococcus aureus MurD inhibitory activity.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2018
Same author

Cat-PROM5: a brief psychometrically robust self-report questionnaire instrument for cataract surgery.

Eye (London, England)·2018
Same author

Cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures: a head-to-head comparison of the psychometric performance and patient acceptability of the Cat-PROM5 and Catquest-9SF self-report questionnaires.

Eye (London, England)·2018
Same author

The PAF complex regulation of Prmt5 facilitates the progression and maintenance of MLL fusion leukemia.

Oncogene·2017
Same journal

Tubing the trabeculectomy: a novel filtration technique.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Retinal non-perfusion progression in severe non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy over time: INSPIRED study report 2.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Macular serpiginous choroiditis versus macular serpiginous-like choroiditis: clinical features, outcomes and prognosis.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Association of baseline brain care score with the incidence of age-related eye diseases.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same journal

A comparative analysis of carbon dioxide versus nitrous oxide as the pressurised gas driving a retinal cryotherapy unit.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Determinants of regression kinetics in observed stage 3 retinopathy of prematurity without plus disease.

Eye (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Compliance with Royal College of Ophthalmologists

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Biometry
  • Clinical Guidelines

Background:

  • Ophthalmologists' biometry guidelines aim to standardize intraocular lens (IOL) calculations.
  • Accurate biometry is crucial for achieving desired refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess adherence to the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' (RCOphth) biometry guidelines across UK eye departments.
  • To identify gaps in the implementation of best practices for ophthalmic biometry.

Main Methods:

  • A structured telephone questionnaire was administered to biometrists in UK eye departments.
  • Data collected included staff qualifications, training, IOL formula usage, and refractive outcome audits.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Only 4% of departments fully complied with RCOphth guidelines for IOL formula selection.
  • A significant proportion (17%) used the outdated SRK II formula.
  • Awareness of refractive prediction errors was low, with only 16% of biometrists knowing the percentage of eyes within 1 D of target.

Conclusions:

  • There is poor awareness and/or implementation of RCOphth biometry guidelines in the UK.
  • Current audits may not be effective in improving practice; guidelines need updating with emphasis on A-constant customization and prediction error benchmarks.