Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pavlovian conditioning: the CS-UR relation.

John W Donahoe1, Rocio Vegas

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, MA 01002, USA. jdonahoe@psych.umass.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes
|January 8, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acquired reinforcement: Implications for autism.

The American psychologist·2022
Same author

Behavior analysis and neuroscience: Complementary disciplines.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2017
Same author

Theory and Behavior Analysis.

The Behavior analyst·2016
Same author

Unified principle of reinforcement in a neural-network model: Reply to N. T. Calvin and J. J. McDowell.

Behavioural processes·2016
Same author

Pavlovian conditioning: pigeon nictitating membrane.

Behavioural processes·2010
Same author

Matching: its acquisition and generalization.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2004

This study reveals that the conditioned stimulus-unconditioned response (CS-UR) relation, not the CS-US relation, is crucial for Pavlovian conditioning. This finding reinterprets conditioning phenomena by focusing on the response rather than just the stimulus.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Psychology
  • Animal Learning
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Pavlovian conditioning is a fundamental learning process.
  • Traditional models emphasize the temporal relationship between conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US).
  • The unconditioned response (UR) is often conflated with the US in standard conditioning procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the critical temporal relation for Pavlovian conditioning.
  • To differentiate the roles of the unconditioned stimulus (US) and unconditioned response (UR) in conditioning.
  • To re-evaluate established conditioning phenomena based on new experimental findings.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel Pavlovian conditioning procedure using fluid-elicited throat movements in pigeons (N=66).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized the substantial latency and duration of the throat-movement response to independently assess CS-US and CS-UR temporal relations.
  • Conducted four experiments to analyze conditioning effects.

    • Main Results:

    • Conditioning was critically dependent on the temporal relation between the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned response (UR).
    • The temporal relation between the CS and the unconditioned stimulus (US) was found to be less critical.
    • This suggests a shift in focus from CS-US to CS-UR associations in this preparation.

    Conclusions:

    • The unconditioned response (UR), not the unconditioned stimulus (US), is operationally critical for conditioning in this pigeon model.
    • Existing conditioning theories may need revision to account for the significance of CS-UR temporal dynamics.
    • This research offers a new framework for understanding various conditioning phenomena.