Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hazard assessment in freshwater ecosystems.

N O Crossland1

  • 1Biology Department, University of Mississippi, Oxford.

Toxicology Letters
|December 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Assessing chemical hazards in freshwater requires comparing expected environmental concentrations (EEC) with no-observed effect concentrations (NOEC). This study reviews experimental methods to reduce uncertainty in hazard assessments for aquatic ecosystems.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Derivation of predicted No-effect concentrations for lindane, 3, 4-dichloroaniline, atrazine, and copper.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·2000
Same author

Development of methods for evaluating toxicity to freshwater ecosystems.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·2000
Same author

Design and construction of model stream ecosystems.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·1996
Same author

An outdoor artificial stream system designed for ecotoxicological studies.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·1991
Same author

A method for evaluating effects of toxic chemicals on the productivity of freshwater ecosystems.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·1988
Same author

Fate of 2,5,4'-trichlorobiphenyl in outdoor ponds and its uptake via the food chain compared with direct uptake via the gills in grass carp and rainbow trout.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·1987

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Ecotoxicology
  • Aquatic Ecology

Background:

  • Chemical hazard assessment in freshwater relies on comparing expected environmental concentrations (EEC) with no-observed effect concentrations (NOEC).
  • Estimating EEC involves chemical release rates, properties, and environmental factors, while NOEC is derived from toxicity tests on aquatic organisms.
  • Uncertainty in extrapolating laboratory data to real-world conditions is a key challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the advantages and disadvantages of various experimental approaches for chemical hazard assessment in freshwater.
  • To discuss methods for resolving uncertainty in environmental risk assessments.
  • To compare different experimental systems, including micro- and mesocosms, and experimental streams.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on experimental approaches for ecotoxicological studies.
  • Analysis of data from laboratory, microcosm, mesocosm, and experimental stream studies.
  • Comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of different testing systems.

Main Results:

  • Different experimental systems offer varying degrees of realism and control for hazard assessment.
  • Field studies using enclosures (microcosms, mesocosms) and streams can reduce uncertainty in extrapolating laboratory findings.
  • The choice of method depends on the specific chemical, ecosystem, and assessment goals.

Conclusions:

  • Controlled field experiments are crucial for improving the accuracy of freshwater chemical hazard assessments.
  • A tiered approach, combining laboratory data with field validation, is recommended.
  • Further research is needed to optimize experimental designs for diverse environmental scenarios.

Related Experiment Videos