Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Robotic mitral valve surgery.

Alan P Kypson1, L Wiley Nifong, W Randolph Chitwood

  • 1Department of Surgery, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Moye Boulevard, Greenville, NC 27858, USA. kypsona@mail.ecu.edu

The Surgical Clinics of North America
|January 10, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply: Model Choice and Interpretation in Coronary Tissue Engineering: Still More Questions Than Answers.

JACC. Basic to translational science·2026
Same author

Acellular Tissue Engineered Vessels as Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts.

JACC. Basic to translational science·2025
Same author

First-in-Human BASILICA Before Valve-in-Valve TAVR in a Mechanically Expanded, Legacy Valve.

JACC. Case reports·2025
Same author

Contemporary review of the evolution of various treatment modalities for mitral regurgitation.

Expert review of cardiovascular therapy·2024
Same author

Unusual cause of myocardial infarction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Clinical case reports·2023
Same author

Robotic Resection of Left Atrial Myxoma With Cryoablation of Tumor Stalk.

Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2023
Same journal

Social Determinants of Health, Health Disparities, and Surgical Equity.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Beyond the Scalpel's Reach.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions-Society.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions-Hospitals.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions for Providers.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions-Patients Social Determinants of Health, Health Disparities, and Surgical Equity.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Robotic cardiac surgery is advancing, offering smaller incisions and improved dexterity. Further technological refinements are needed to overcome current limitations for widespread adoption.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally invasive cardiac surgery
  • Robotic surgery
  • Surgical technology

Background:

  • Computer-enhanced telemanipulation systems show promise but have limitations.
  • Technological advancements like nitinol U-clips reduce operative times.
  • Robotic systems offer improved optics, smaller incisions, and enhanced surgeon dexterity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the early clinical experience with computer-enhanced telemanipulation systems in cardiac surgery.
  • To discuss the benefits and limitations of current robotic technology in cardiac procedures.
  • To explore the future potential and necessary developments for fully endoscopic robotic cardiac surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Review of early clinical experiences with computer-enhanced telemanipulation systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of technological advancements, including nitinol U-clips and robotic instrumentation.
  • Discussion of current constraints and future directions for robotic cardiac surgery.

    • Main Results:

    • Robotic systems provide benefits such as smaller incisions, improved dexterity, tremor filtration, and magnified 3D visualization.
    • Nitinol U-clips significantly decrease operative times compared to sutures.
    • Current limitations include instrument size, intrathoracic collisions, and the need for a working port for retraction and retrieval.

    Conclusions:

    • Robotic cardiac surgery is evolving, with progress made towards endoscopic valve operations.
    • Further refinements in instrument size, specialized retractors, and delivery/retrieval systems are needed for a truly endoscopic approach.
    • Continued critical evaluation of safety, recovery, cost, and long-term outcomes is essential, comparing against traditional valve operations.