Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perusing property rights in DNA.

F Scott Kieff1

  • 1Washington University School of Law, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.

Advances in Genetics
|January 13, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Patent rights for DNA are complex, but practical issues are often overstated. Understanding how these intellectual property rights function reveals that market behaviors mitigate potential inefficiencies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence and anecdotes: an analysis of human gene patenting controversies.

Nature biotechnology·2006
Same author

How ordinary judges and juries decide the seemingly complex technological questions of patentability over the prior art.

Advances in genetics·2004
Same journal

Shaping mammalian genomes: The regulation and co-option of transposable elements in early development and gametogenesis.

Advances in genetics·2026
Same journal

Transposable elements in aging: From biomarkers to effectors.

Advances in genetics·2026
Same journal

Transposable elements in human cancer: Regulation, activation, and genomic consequences.

Advances in genetics·2026
Same journal

Retrotransposons as both "architects" and "saboteurs" in the nervous system.

Advances in genetics·2026
Same journal

Transposable element analysis in OMICS data.

Advances in genetics·2026
Same journal

The implication of lncRNAs in the regulation of inflammation.

Advances in genetics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology Law
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • The proliferation of DNA patents post-Diamond v. Chakrabarty (1980) raises critical questions about ownership and rights.
  • Existing debates surrounding DNA patentability are often burdened by misconceptions about practical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the actual operation of property rights concerning DNA.
  • To identify and address practical problems and inefficiencies in DNA patent transactions.
  • To offer a more informed perspective on the debate surrounding DNA patentability.

Main Methods:

  • Analytical approach to deconstruct the complexities of DNA property rights.
  • Examination of how market participants' behaviors influence patent effectiveness.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of theoretical concerns versus practical outcomes in DNA patent law.

    • Main Results:

    • Concerns about inefficiencies caused by DNA patents are often exaggerated in theory.
    • Market behaviors and established practices effectively mitigate many potential problems.
    • Alternative patent regimes may introduce more significant inefficiencies than current practices.

    Conclusions:

    • A clearer understanding of practical DNA patent mechanisms is needed.
    • Focus should shift from theoretical concerns to practical solutions for transaction breakdowns.
    • Current market dynamics, despite theoretical flaws, prove more effective than alternative systems.