Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Should obstetricians support a 'term cephalic trial'?

Stephen Robson1, David Ellwood

  • 1Division of Women's and Children's Health, The Canberra Hospital, Woden, Australian Capital Territory, Australia. steve.robson@act.gov.au

The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
|January 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Determinants of Infant Participation and Non-Participation in Primary Prevention Trials.

Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme·2026
Same author

Interpreting Australian Stillbirth Rate Trends: Implications for Surveillance and Continuous Quality Improvement.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same author

Clinical Utility of Stillbirth Investigations in Australia: A Cohort Study.

The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same author

Implementing the Safer Baby Bundle for stillbirth prevention across Queensland maternity services using a modified breakthrough series collaborative.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same author

Identifying Key Areas to Improve Care for Families Around the Time of Stillbirth or Neonatal Death: A Survey of Maternity Services in Australia.

The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same author

The Routine 36-Week Scan-Is It Time for a Change in Policy and Practice? The Arguments for a Routine Third Trimester Ultrasound in Australian Healthcare.

The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology·2026

Elective Caesarean delivery risks may not outweigh vaginal birth benefits in uncomplicated pregnancies. Further research via a randomised controlled trial is suggested to clarify optimal delivery methods for term cephalic babies.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Background:

  • Published data analyses indicate a closer balance between risks and benefits of vaginal birth versus elective Caesarean delivery than previously assumed.
  • Uncomplicated pregnancies may not universally benefit from elective Caesarean delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the comparative risks and benefits of elective Caesarean delivery versus vaginal birth in uncomplicated pregnancies.
  • To determine if a randomised controlled trial on elective Caesarean delivery for term cephalic babies is warranted.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of existing published data on pregnancy delivery outcomes.
  • Discussion of the potential implications and design considerations for a randomised controlled trial.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Current evidence suggests the benefits of elective Caesarean delivery may be overestimated compared to vaginal birth.
  • The risk-benefit balance is close, prompting consideration for further investigation.

Conclusions:

  • Elective Caesarean delivery in uncomplicated pregnancies requires re-evaluation.
  • A randomised controlled trial is proposed to definitively assess the optimal delivery method for term cephalic infants and inform obstetric practice.