Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Informed consent and decision making by cataract patients.

Christopher G Kiss1, Sibylla Richter-Mueksch, Eva Stifter

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Archives of Ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
|January 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Informed consent before cataract surgery rarely changes patient decisions, even when risks are not fully understood. Patients often confirm pre-existing choices due to cognitive dissonance, impacting surgical decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The design of Malay sentences for measuring reading performance for the Radner-UKM Malay Reading Charts.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Outcomes of Strabismus Surgery in Patients with Cranial Nerve Palsy.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Multicenter Retrospective Study of Spiroplasma ixodetis Infantile Cataract in 8 Countries in Europe.

Emerging infectious diseases·2025
Same author

Letter to the editor: ISO 7921:2024-A new international standard for measurement of reading acuity.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2025
Same author

Longitudinal clinical characteristics of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie·2025
Same author

Pediatric and Juvenile Strabismus Surgery Under General Anesthesia: Functional Outcomes and Safety.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Decision Making
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Patient decision-making processes before surgery are complex.
  • The effectiveness of informed consent procedures in influencing patient choices requires further investigation.
  • Understanding patient comprehension of surgical risks is crucial for ethical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate patient decision-making dynamics on the day before cataract surgery.
  • To evaluate the influence of the informed consent process on patient decisions regarding surgical consent.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 70 patients (mean age 70.3 years) underwent a standardized informed consent procedure.
  • Patients completed a 15-question survey assessing presurgical information, risk perception, patient-physician relationship, and informed consent evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data were collected the day before cataract surgery.

    • Main Results:

    • 40% of patients lacked presurgical information; 23% believed surgery had no risks.
    • 77% of patients were not influenced by potential sight-threatening complications.
    • 78% reported the informed consent process did not alter their decision, though 22% found it confirmatory.

    Conclusions:

    • Informed consent provided one day before cataract surgery appears to have minimal impact on patient decisions.
    • Cognitive dissonance likely contributes to patients' reluctance to alter decisions already made.
    • The limited influence of late-stage informed consent on decision-making is a critical consideration in ophthalmologic surgery and clinical trials.