Related Experiment Videos
From archetypes to reflective function.
1Oxford.
The Journal of Analytical Psychology
|January 15, 2004
Summary
This study proposes that mental contents develop through gene-brain-environment interactions, not innate programming. It traces key developmental steps, including schema formation and symbolic capacity, culminating in reflective function.
Related Concept Videos
You might also read
Related Articles
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Sort by
Same author
'Feeling for' and 'feeling with': developmental and neuroscientific perspectives on intersubjectivity and empathy.
The Journal of analytical psychology·2013
Same author
Dissociation and shame: shadow aspects of multiplicity.
The Journal of analytical psychology·2011
Same author
Responses to Erik Goodwyn's 'Approaching archetypes: reconsidering innateness'.
The Journal of analytical psychology·2010
Same author
Response to 'Emotions in action through the looking glass'.
The Journal of analytical psychology·2010
Same author
Mirror neurons and embodied simulation in the development of archetypes and self-agency.
The Journal of analytical psychology·2009
Same journal
What Sort of a Thing is an Archetype? Archetypes, Complexes and Self-Organization Revisited.
The Journal of analytical psychology·2025
Same journal
Emotional Intelligence and Transformation in Analytical Psychology: A Case Study.
The Journal of analytical psychology·2025
Same journal
Community with the Dead: Jung's Black Books Epiphany and the Role of Toni Wolff.
The Journal of analytical psychology·2025
Same journal
Jung's Koan of the Self and a Zen Buddhist Solution.
The Journal of analytical psychology·2025
Same journal
Dreaming Ubuntu: Jungian Studies, Forgiveness, and Jung's Recalcitrant Fourth.
The Journal of analytical psychology·2025