Related Experiment Videos
Pain assessment in intellectually disabled people: non-verbal indicators
Sandra M G Zwakhalen1, Katinka A J van Dongen, Jan P H Hamers
1Clinical Researcher, Department of Health Care Studies, Section of Nursing Science, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. s.zwakhalen@zw.unimaas.nl
Journal of Advanced Nursing
|January 15, 2004
Summary
Nurses use many non-verbal cues to assess pain in individuals with intellectual disabilities. The chosen indicators vary based on the person's functional abilities and disability level.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Research
- Pain Management
- Intellectual Disabilities Care
Background:
- Pain assessment in individuals with intellectual disabilities remains a significant challenge for healthcare professionals.
- Limited research exists on pain experiences and assessment in this population.
- Understanding pain indicators is crucial for effective nursing care and knowledge advancement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and evaluate the significance of non-verbal pain indicators used by nurses.
- To differentiate pain assessment strategies for individuals with severe versus profound intellectual disabilities.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire survey was administered to 135 nurses across nine specialized institutions.
- Nurses rated 158 potential pain indicators on a scale of 1-10 for importance.
- Data were collected on nurses' perceptions of non-verbal pain expressions.
Main Results:
- 109 nurses responded, indicating all 158 indicators were relevant to pain assessment.
- Seven indicators, including moaning, crying, and painful facial expressions, were deemed 'very important' by over 50% of respondents.
- Pain assessment varied between severe and profound intellectual disabilities, with physiological indicators prioritized for profound and social-emotional for severe disabilities.
Conclusions:
- Nurses employ a broad spectrum of non-verbal indicators for pain assessment in people with intellectual disabilities.
- The selection of pain indicators is influenced by the individual's functional capacity and the severity of their intellectual disability.