Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Zero interaction response surfaces, interaction functions and difference response surfaces for combinations of

J Sühnel1

  • 1Institute of Microbiology and Experimental Therapy, Jena, Fed. Rep. of Germany.

Arzneimittel-Forschung
|October 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

This study clarifies combination experiment evaluation using the isobole approach. New methods combining isoboles with response surface modeling and graphics assess agent interactions effectively.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative analysis of the Borrelia garinii genome.

Nucleic acids research·2004
Same author

Beyond nucleic acid base pairs: from triads to heptads.

Biopolymers·2002
Same author

More hydrogen bonds for the (structural) biologist.

Trends in biochemical sciences·2001
Same author

Toxicology of simple and complex mixtures.

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2001
Same author

Quantum-chemical analysis of C-H...O and C-H...N interactions in RNA base pairs--H-bond versus anti-H-bond pattern.

Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics·2001
Same author

C-H...pi-interactions in proteins.

Journal of molecular biology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Biostatistics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Widespread confusion exists regarding definitions and methods for evaluating interactions between biologically active agents in combination experiments.
  • The classical isobole approach is a widely used but sometimes insufficient method for assessing these interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce novel, powerful methods for assessing the interaction of biologically active agents in combination experiments.
  • To integrate the classical isobole approach with response surface modeling and computer graphics for enhanced interaction assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized response surface modeling and computer graphics to enhance the classical isobole approach.
  • Proposed and defined new concepts: zero interaction response surfaces, difference response surfaces, and interaction functions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Developed methods that visually represent zero interaction across dose ranges (zero interaction response surfaces).
  • Introduced difference response surfaces to quantify deviations from expected non-interactive responses.
  • Proposed interaction functions as a dose-dependent generalization of interaction indices.

Conclusions:

  • The integration of isobole approach with response surface modeling and computer graphics provides robust tools for evaluating agent interactions.
  • The proposed methods offer a more comprehensive understanding of dose-dependent interactions between biologically active agents.
  • These advancements aim to reduce confusion and improve the rigor of combination experiment evaluations.