Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Improved survival with ventricular assist device support in cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction
John W C Entwistle1, Paul B Bolno, Elena Holmes
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. john.entwistle@drexel.edu
Insights
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support offers a 54% survival rate for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Biventricular assist device (BiVAD) support is less effective, primarily stabilizing patients for transplantation with a poor overall prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Mechanical Circulatory Support
Background:
- Cardiogenic shock post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) carries a high mortality risk.
- Medical management often fails in severe AMI-induced cardiogenic shock.
- Mechanical circulatory support devices are explored for refractory cases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of Abiomed devices in treating acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS).
- To compare outcomes between left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and biventricular assist device (BiVAD) support in AMI-CS patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 17 patients treated with Abiomed BVS 5000 devices (1994-2002).
- Patients were categorized based on primary cardiac dysfunction: left ventricular (LV) or biventricular (BiV) failure.
- Outcomes assessed included device weaning, survival to discharge, and transplantation.
Main Results:
- Eleven patients with LV dysfunction received LVAD support; 6 (54%) survived to discharge.
- Six patients with BiV failure received BiVAD support; none were weaned.
- Two BiVAD patients received transplants, with only one surviving.
Conclusions:
- LVAD support can achieve a 54% survival rate in AMI-CS patients with predominant left ventricular failure failing medical management.
- BiVAD support may stabilize patients with biventricular failure for transplantation, but overall prognosis remains poor.
- Mechanical circulatory support offers a potential survival benefit in select AMI-CS patients.
Background:
Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction is associated with a very high mortality rate.
Methods:
A retrospective review was performed of records of all patients supported with an Abiomed device at our institution between 1994 and 2002 to identify those patients who underwent device insertion for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS).
Results:
Seventeen patients who were suffering from AMI-CS and for whom medical management was failing were supported using the Abiomed BVS 5000. The average age of these patients was 57.6 years. Eleven patients were suffering primarily from left ventricular dysfunction and were supported with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Eight of these patients were weaned from device support, a nd 6 survived to hospital discharge (54%). In contrast, 6 patients presented with biventricular failure and were supported with biventricular VADs (BiVADs). None of these BiVAD patients could be weaned from device support. Two BiVAD patients underwent cardiac transplantation, and only one survived.
Conclusion:
In the presence of left ventricular failure producing cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction, LVAD support can produce a 54% survival rate in those patients w ho are failing medical management. However, in patients in biventricular failure after myocardial infarction, BiVAD support may be used to stabilize the patient until transplantation, but the overall prognosis remains poor.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
