Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Mesocosm-Scale Constructed Wetland Design for Wastewater Treatment
Published on: May 2, 2025
Performance of a sub-surface flow constructed wetland in polishing pre-treated wastewater-a tropical case study
1University College of Lands and Architectural Studies, Department of Environmental Engineering, P.O. Box 35176, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. kaseva@uccmail.co.tz
Abstract:
This paper reports on the performance of three units of a sub-surface horizontal flow constructed wetland (CW) pilot plant in polishing effluent from the upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor plant. Studies on the use of UASB for on-site wastewater pre-treatment were initiated in Tanzania for the first time in 1993, while initial research works on the application of CW for polishing effluent from UASB, the results of which are reported in this paper began in 1999. In this study the UASB reactor plant received and pre-treated part of the wastewater from the student's hostels at the University College of Lands and Architectural Studies in Tanzania. Out of the three units, unit B was planted with Phragmites mauritianus, unit C with Typha latifolia and A was used as a control. Both P.mauritianus and T.latifolia have been extensively researched in Europe and USA as suitable species of vegetation in CW. However, very limited studies on the suitability of these wetland plants have been reported under tropical climate. The studied parameters were chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrate (NO(3)-N), nitrite (NO(2)-N), ammonium (NH(4)-N), faecal coliforms (FC), total coliforms (TC), pH, temperature and dissolved oxygen (DO). The study was carried out at an average hydraulic retention time of 1.93 days (1.85 in unit A, 1.96 in unit B and 1.99 in unit C) obtained as a ratio of the volume of wastewater in the wetland and the volumetric flow rate of wastewater through the wetland unit while taking into consideration the porosity of the media. Better performance for the vegetated units B and C were obtained compared to the control unit A. Nutrients were least removed in all units (NH(4)-N 11.2%, 25.2% and 23% in units A, B and C, respectively, NO(3)-N 32.2%, 40.3% and 44.3% for units A, B and C, respectively, and NO(2)-N 23.9%, 38.5% and 23.1% for units A, B and C, respectively). The COD removal rate was 33.6%, 56.3% and 60.7% for units A, B and C, respectively. The study also indicated that pH increased from the influent to the effluent and that DO increase was related to the decrease of temperature. FC and TC removal ranged from 43% to 72%, with the least removal in unit A.
More Related Videos
08:49Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
08:09Wastewater Irrigation Impacts on Soil Hydraulic Conductivity: Coupled Field Sampling and Laboratory Determination of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Published on: August 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Wastewater Treatment
Biological Treatment of Effluent and Waste Water
Environmental Applications of Microorganisms
Testing Water Quality