Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality of dental implants.

Asbjørn Jokstad1, Urs Braegger, John B Brunski

  • 1Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Blindern, Norway. jokstad@odont.uio.no

International Dental Journal
|January 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Dental implant manufacturers make many unsubstantiated claims. Current scientific literature offers no clear guidance on how specific implant features impact clinical performance, despite numerous available options.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Environmental impacts from intraoral polymer devices: A systematic review.

Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials·2025
Same author

A Multicenter Study of Factors Related to Early Implant Failures-Part 2: Patient Factors.

Clinical implant dentistry and related research·2025
Same author

Effects of scan body material, length and top design on digital implant impression accuracy and usability: an <i>in vitro</i> study.

The journal of advanced prosthodontics·2025
Same author

A Multicenter Study of Factors Related to Early Implant Failures-Part 1: Implant Materials and Surgical Techniques.

Clinical implant dentistry and related research·2025
Same author

Risk of Dental Implant Failure with Obesity.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2025
Same author

Inflammatory Response to Wear Particles: Comparisons Between Zirconia and Titanium In Vitro.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2024

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Implantology
  • Clinical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Clinicians require robust data for selecting appropriate dental implants.
  • Evaluating the link between dental implant characteristics and clinical outcomes is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review scientific evidence supporting manufacturers' claims about dental implant characteristics.
  • To assess the relationship between specific implant features and their clinical performance.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a systematic search of promotional materials and scientific literature.
  • Critically appraised research to determine the validity of claims regarding implant design and performance.
  • Focused on identifying evidence for implant superiority linked to specific characteristics.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Over 220 dental implant brands exist, with numerous design variations.
  • Titanium and titanium alloy implants show good clinical performance in well-prepared bone.
  • Many manufacturer claims regarding design superiority lack robust, long-term clinical evidence.
  • Some implants are marketed without demonstrated adherence to international standards.

Conclusions:

  • The scientific literature does not currently support claims of benefits from specific morphological characteristics of dental implants.
  • Further high-quality research is needed to guide dental implant selection based on evidence.