Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate.

W Tecumseh Fitch1, Marc D Hauser

  • 1School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 9AJ, Scotland. wtsf@st-andrews.ac.uk

Science (New York, N.Y.)
|January 17, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Constraint and convergence in the evolution of vertebrate sound production.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Novel Approach to Inter-Onset-Interval Ratio Uncovers Music-Like Rhythmic Patterns in Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) Warble Song.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2025
Same author

What enables human language? A biocultural framework.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

The evolutionary functions of consciousness.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Work together, move together-Cooperation and rapport promote interpersonal synchrony.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Correction: Rats can distinguish (and generalize) among two white wine varieties.

Animal cognition·2025
Same journal

Erratum for the Research Article "Detecting supramolecular organic nanoparticles during heat wave".

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Local signals, systemic decline.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

The mechanics of liver regeneration.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Computing in a memory with physics.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Retraction.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Making time.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Monkeys can learn simple rule systems in communication, but they cannot master complex, hierarchical grammars essential for human language. This suggests a cognitive limitation in non-human primates for advanced language structures.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Animal Behavior
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • Human language is unique in its ability to generate infinite expressions from finite elements.
  • Animal communication systems typically lack the generative power of human language.
  • Grammars, or rule systems, vary in complexity and generative capacity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the capacity of non-human primates to learn different levels of grammatical complexity.
  • To determine if monkeys can spontaneously acquire rule systems with local organizational principles.
  • To assess if monkeys can master hierarchical grammars, such as phrase structure grammars.

Main Methods:

  • Familiarization/discrimination paradigm was employed.
  • Monkeys were exposed to sequences governed by different rule systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance was assessed based on the ability to distinguish grammatical from ungrammatical sequences.
  • Main Results:

    • Monkeys demonstrated the ability to spontaneously master grammars with local organizational principles.
    • Monkeys were unable to master grammars with hierarchical structure (phrase structure grammar).
    • This was observed using the same methods, syllables, and sequence lengths.

    Conclusions:

    • Monkeys possess the cognitive capacity to learn simple, local grammars.
    • Monkeys lack the ability to acquire the hierarchical structures characteristic of human language.
    • The findings highlight a significant cognitive difference between human language and animal communication systems.