Resolving conflict and building cooperation in the National Estuary program
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Continuous Instream Monitoring of Nutrients and Sediment in Agricultural Watersheds
Published on: September 26, 2017
1Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, One Shields Aven, Davis, California 95616, USA. mnlubell@ucdavis.edu
Abstract:
Since its beginning in 1987, researchers and policymakers have touted the US Environmental Protection Agency National Estuary program (NEP) as one of the leading examples of collaborative institutions designed to resolve conflict and build cooperation at the watershed level. Using the NEP as an example, I summarize the advantages and disadvantages of collaborative institutions. Using data gathered from focused surveys of policy elites in 22 estuaries, I estimate statistical models that show the NEP does a better job of resolving conflict and building project-level cooperation than similar estuaries without the NEP. I also describe the activities of the NEP mentioned by respondents as contributing to this outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Robbers Cave
Quality of Water
Net Change Theorem
Biological Treatment of Effluent and Waste Water
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation
Bioremediation

