Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mechanical interdependence of version and vergence eye movements.

Ansgar Koene1, Casper Erkelens

  • 1INSERM Unité 354, Espace et Action, Bron, France. koene@lyon.inserm.fr

Strabismus
|January 20, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Independent control of eye version and vergence is mechanically impossible. Eye muscle activity for vertical movements changes with the vergence angle, challenging previous assumptions about eye movement control.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of algorithmic decision-making processes on young people's well-being.

Health informatics journal·2021
Same author

A comparison of presentation methods for conducting youth juries.

PloS one·2019
Same author

Bimodal sensory discrimination is finer than dual single modality discrimination.

Journal of vision·2007
Same author

Saccadic lateropulsion in Wallenberg syndrome: a window to access cerebellar control of saccades?

Experimental brain research·2006
Same author

Visual search for a target changing in synchrony with an auditory signal.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2006
Same author

Transfer of adaptation from visually guided saccades to averaging saccades elicited by double visual targets.

The European journal of neuroscience·2004

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomechanics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The control of eye movements involves both version (gaze direction) and vergence (convergence/divergence).
  • Independent control of these movements is a theoretical concept often assumed in eye movement models.
  • Understanding the mechanical constraints of the eye plant is crucial for validating these models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanical compatibility of independent control of version and vergence eye movements.
  • To determine if the eye's mechanics inherently link version and vergence control.
  • To explain the binocular extension of Listing's law (L2) through mechanical principles.

Main Methods:

  • Computational analysis of eye muscle action axes as a function of ocular vergence.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Modeling the relationship between muscle pulley locations, vergence angle, and eye orientation.
  • Evaluating the conditions under which independent control could satisfy L2.

    • Main Results:

    • Vertical version control is dependent on the initial vergence angle, irrespective of muscle pulley locations.
    • A mechanical explanation for L2 requires that muscle pulleys move with changes in vergence.
    • Specific ranges of muscle pulley locations can reconcile independent control with L2, but necessitate vergence-dependent pulley movement.

    Conclusions:

    • The concept of completely independent control of version and vergence eye movements is not compatible with eye plant mechanics.
    • The binocular extension of Listing's law (L2) can be explained by the vergence-dependent mechanics of the eye plant, specifically involving moving muscle pulleys.
    • Future eye movement models must account for these mechanical interdependencies for greater accuracy.