Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predicting long bone loading from cross-sectional geometry.

Daniel E Lieberman1, John D Polk, Brigitte Demes

  • 1Department of Anthropology, Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.

American Journal of Physical Anthropology
|January 20, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Longitudinal and cross-sectional evidence that daily resting and activity energy expenditures are independent in humans.

The Journal of physiology·2026
Same author

Non-invasive load measurement in the human tibia via spectral analysis of flexural waves.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026
Same author

The Conundrum of Exercise for Weight Management in the GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Era.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Advanced footwear technology versus minimalist footwear for injury prevention and performance in runners.

PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Physical activity and metabolic rates in humans.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same author

Revised Body Mass Estimates for Extinct Lemurs.

American journal of biological anthropology·2025
Same journal

A geometric morphometric assessment of shape variation in adult pelvic morphology.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

Corrigendum: Infanticide in chimpanzees: Taphonomic case studies from Gombe.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

Sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of the non-obstetric pelvis across anthropoids.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

The biological index of frailty: A new index for the assessment of frailty in human skeletal remains.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

Mass violence in Copper Age Europe: The massacre burial site from Potočani, Croatia.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
Same journal

Skeletal evidence of structural violence among undocumented migrants from Mexico and Central America.

American journal of physical anthropology·2021
See all related articles

Beam models for long bone loading often assume neutral axes align with centroids. This study in sheep shows this assumption is flawed, impacting accurate bone strength and load orientation analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Orthopedic Research
  • Skeletal Physiology

Background:

  • Long bone loading is typically assessed using beam models and cross-sectional second moments of area (SMAs).
  • Common analyses implicitly assume neutral axes align with area centroids and maximum bending rigidity reflects habitual loading orientations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the validity of assumptions regarding neutral axis alignment with centroids and bending rigidity orientation in sheep long bones.
  • To quantify the impact of these assumptions on cross-sectional property calculations and load orientation estimations.

Main Methods:

  • In vivo measurements of bone strains using rosette strain gauges on sheep tibiae and metatarsals during treadmill running.
  • Calculation of cross-sectional properties based on both centroidal axes and experimentally determined neutral axes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of calculated strain distributions and cross-sectional properties between the two methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Neutral axes of bending were found to deviate from midshaft centroids in sheep long bones.
    • Orientations of maximum SMAs (Imax) did not consistently align with the planes of habitual bone bending.
    • Cross-sectional properties calculated using centroidal axes showed significant magnitude differences (up to 55%) compared to neutral axis calculations, though patterns were correlated.

    Conclusions:

    • Standard assumptions in SMA analyses, particularly neutral axis alignment with centroids, can lead to substantial errors in absolute cross-sectional property values.
    • Interindividual comparisons of bone strength based on centroidal properties may be valid for pattern but not absolute magnitude.
    • Cross-sectional properties alone may not reliably indicate the orientation of habitual loads experienced by long bones.