Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Exploring the limits of spatial memory in rats, using very large mazes.

Mark R Cole1, Robyn Chappell-Stephenson

  • 1Department of Psychology, Huron University College, London, Ontario, Canada. mcole@uwo.ca

Learning & Behavior
|January 22, 2004
PubMed
Summary

Spatial separation significantly impacts rat foraging behavior and spatial memory. Performance declines with increased arm/tower density, highlighting spacing over sheer quantity.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Domesticated dogs (Canis familiaris) tend to follow repeated deceptive human cues even when food is visible.

Learning & behavior·2018
Same author

Place versus response learning in rats.

Learning & behavior·2007
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Animal Cognition

Background:

  • Spatial memory is crucial for foraging efficiency in many species.
  • Understanding the limits of spatial memory in rats informs broader cognitive theories.
  • Radial maze tasks are standard for assessing spatial learning and memory in rodents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of the number and spatial arrangement of food locations on rat foraging behavior.
  • To determine whether spatial separation or the sheer quantity of locations is a greater determinant of performance.
  • To explore the limits of spatial memory in rats under varying environmental conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Rats foraged in radial mazes and circular floor arrangements with varying numbers of arms/towers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments manipulated the number of locations (8-48) and their spatial separation (random, tight, spread-out, constant cm).
  • Performance was measured by the percentage of novel choices made by the rats.

    • Main Results:

    • Spatial separation, not the number of arms/towers, was the primary factor influencing performance.
    • Performance decreased in tight configurations and with increasing density in spread-out configurations.
    • Constant spatial separation showed declining novel choices as locations increased, but performance improved when locations decreased.

    Conclusions:

    • Rat spatial memory is constrained by the spatial separation of resources, not just the quantity.
    • Optimal foraging and memory performance depend on maintaining adequate spatial separation between locations.
    • These findings contribute to understanding the fundamental limits of spatial memory and navigation.