Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Murine Bilateral Renal Lymphadenectomy
Published on: December 30, 2025
A medical oncologist's approach to immunotherapy for advanced renal tumors: is nephrectomy indicated?
Matthew M Cooney1, Scot C Remick, Nicholas J Vogelzang
1Division of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. matthewcooney@yahoo.com
Abstract:
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma is highly resistant to systemic therapy. Although interleukin-2 and interferon remain the most active agents for this disease, long-term survival rates remain poor. Two phase 3 trials, European Organization Research and Treatment of Cancer 30947 and Southwest Oncology Group 8949, have demonstrated a survival benefit of nephrectomy followed by interferon versus interferon alone in patients having an excellent performance status (PS 0 and 1). Removal of the primary tumor followed by interferon is not recommended for patients with a moderate or poor PS (PS 2-4). Even with this aggressive approach, most patients eventually will die from their kidney cancer; therefore, every patient with metastatic disease should be considered for enrollment into clinical trials.
Insights
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (kidney cancer) is difficult to treat. Surgery followed by interferon improved survival for patients with good performance status, but not for those with poor status.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Nephrology
Background:
- Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) exhibits significant resistance to systemic therapies.
- Interleukin-2 and interferon are the most effective agents, yet long-term survival rates for mRCC remain suboptimal.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the survival benefit of nephrectomy followed by interferon compared to interferon alone in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
- To determine the impact of performance status on the efficacy of this combined treatment approach.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of two Phase 3 clinical trials: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30947 and Southwest Oncology Group 8949.
- Comparison of outcomes in patients with excellent performance status (PS 0-1) versus moderate to poor performance status (PS 2-4).
Main Results:
- Nephrectomy followed by interferon demonstrated a survival benefit over interferon alone in patients with excellent performance status (PS 0-1).
- This combined approach was not recommended for patients with moderate or poor performance status (PS 2-4).
Conclusions:
- For select patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and good performance status, nephrectomy followed by interferon offers a survival advantage.
- Treatment decisions should consider patient performance status, and all patients with metastatic disease should be considered for clinical trials due to the overall poor prognosis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...

