Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
Published on: April 1, 2016
What determines the speed of lexical access: homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al.
Alfonso Caramazza1, Yanchao Bi, Albert Costa
1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. caram@wjh.harvard.edu
Abstract:
A. Caramazza, A. Costa, M. Miozzo, and Y. Bi (2001) reported a series of experiments showing that naming latencies for homophones are determined by specific-word frequency (e.g., frequency of nun) and not homophone frequency (frequency of nun + none). J. D. Jescheniak, A. S. Meyer, and W. J. M. Levelt (2003) have challenged these studies on a variety of grounds. Here we argue that these criticisms are not well founded and try to clarify the theoretical issues that can be meaningfully addressed by considering the effects of frequency on homophone production. We conclude that the evidence from homophone production cannot be considered to provide support to 2-layer theories of the lexical system.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Language and Cognition
The Availability Heuristic
Components of Language
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Nonconscious Mimicry

