Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Brain potentials during semantic and prosodic processing in French.

Corine Astésano1, Mireille Besson, Kai Alter

  • 1Institut de Neurosciences Physiologiques et Cognitives, CNRS, 31, Chemin Joseph Aiguier, 13402 Marseille cedex 20, France. astesano@lnf.cnrs-mrs.fr

Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research
|January 23, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence for a Transient State of Auditory Hypersensitivity During Initial Onset of Tinnitus: IDAEP Changes Between Acute and Chronic Tinnitus.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

What determines the success of AI voice-cloned speech? Prosodic and acoustic evidence on three TTS systems.

Phonetica·2026
Same author

Stimulus statistical context sensitivity of deviant responses to auditory intensity changes.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Repetition positivity following auditory intensity or frequency changes in young normal-hearing adults.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same author

Is mild intellectual disability associated with a rhythmic skills impairment? A developmental perspective.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Pre-attentive Pitch Processing of Harmonic Complex Sounds at Sensor and Source Levels: Comparing Simultaneously Recorded EEG and MEG Data.

Brain topography·2025
Same journal

Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

On the neural basis of focused and divided attention.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

Task difficulty in a simultaneous face matching task modulates activity in face fusiform area.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

The role of the left Brodmann's areas 44 and 45 in reading words and pseudowords.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in English.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
Same journal

Individual differences in brain activity during visuo-spatial processing assessed by slow cortical potentials and LORETA.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2005
See all related articles

This study investigated semantic and prosodic sentence processing using Event-Related brain Potentials (ERPs). Findings reveal distinct neural markers for semantic (N400) and prosodic (P800) mismatches, suggesting interactive processing.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding how the brain processes language in real-time is crucial.
  • Distinguishing between semantic (meaning) and prosodic (intonation) information processing is key to language comprehension.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the on-line processing of semantic and prosodic information.
  • To determine if semantic and prosodic processing are independent or interactive.
  • To identify the time course and neural correlates of these processes.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded Event-Related brain Potentials (ERPs) in response to aurally presented sentences.
  • Manipulated semantic and prosodic congruity, including prosodic mismatch via statement/question cross-splicing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjects performed congruity judgments under different attention conditions.
  • Main Results:

    • A right centro-parietal negative component (N400) correlated with semantic mismatch.
    • A left temporo-parietal positive component (P800) correlated with prosodic mismatch.
    • The P800 amplitude was larger for prosodic mismatches in semantically incongruous sentences, indicating interaction.

    Conclusions:

    • Semantic and prosodic processing are associated with distinct electrophysiological markers (N400 and P800) differing in polarity, latency, and distribution.
    • These differences suggest potentially separate underlying neural generators for semantic and prosodic processing.
    • Evidence points towards an interaction between semantic and prosodic language processing systems.