Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Revision rhinoplasty.

Thomas Romo1, Jonathan Sonne, Kyle S Choe

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY, USA. docromo@aol.com

Facial Plastic Surgery : FPS
|January 23, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does Severity of the Bony Facial Trauma Score Predict Cost of Management in Patients with Facial Trauma: A Large Database Study.

Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine·2026
Same author

"Endoscopic-assisted, subperiosteal browlift bone fixation technique outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis".

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Reduction Structured Rhinoplasty.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2025
Same author

Factors Contributing to Burnout and Professional Fulfillment among AAFPRS Members.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2025
Same author

Cost and Inpatient Burden of Mandible Fracture Management: A 14-Year Analysis.

The Laryngoscope·2024
Same author

Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment in Inpatient and Ambulatory Otolaryngology Surgical Patients.

The Laryngoscope·2024
Same journal

In-Office Surgical Procedures for Prejuvenation.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

Platelet-Rich Plasma and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Facial Plastic Surgery: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

Neck Contouring Prejuvenation Techniques.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

Lip Rejuvenation Options in the Youthful Population.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

Impact of Functional Rhinoplasty on Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
Same journal

The Use of Muscle-Hitch and Internal Gradual Tension Quilting Sutures for Eyebrow Lift Using an Open Temple Approach.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2026
See all related articles

Revision rhinoplasty often requires grafting material when septal cartilage is unavailable. Porous high-density polyethylene (PHDPE) demonstrates excellent properties as an alloplastic implant for these complex facial plastic surgery cases.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Revision rhinoplasty presents significant surgical challenges.
  • Grafting materials are frequently necessary due to limited autogenous septal cartilage.
  • Various alloplastic materials are available for nasal reconstruction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail a senior author's approach to evaluating revision rhinoplasty candidates.
  • To describe surgical techniques utilizing porous high-density polyethylene (PHDPE).
  • To compare the properties, advantages, and disadvantages of commonly used allografts in revision rhinoplasty.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of patient selection criteria for revision rhinoplasty.
  • Surgical technique description using porous high-density polyethylene (PHDPE) implants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of alloplastic graft materials including mersilene, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, and PHDPE.

    • Main Results:

    • Porous high-density polyethylene (PHDPE) exhibits favorable properties for revision rhinoplasty implants.
    • Comparison highlights the advantages and disadvantages of different alloplastic materials.
    • The senior author's method for candidate evaluation and PHDPE utilization is emphasized.

    Conclusions:

    • Porous high-density polyethylene (PHDPE) is an excellent alloplastic implant choice for revision rhinoplasty.
    • Understanding the properties of various allografts is crucial for successful revision rhinoplasty outcomes.
    • The presented techniques offer valuable insights for facial plastic surgeons performing complex nasal reconstructions.