Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Codon usage decreases the error minimization within the genetic code.

Chen-Tseh Zhu1, Xiao-Bin Zeng, Wei-Da Huang

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5245, USA.

Journal of Molecular Evolution
|January 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structurally diverse tetrahydroxanthone analogues from Paraconiothyrium sp. AC31 with pyroptosis induction through targeted inhibition of PARP1 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Bioorganic chemistry·2025
Same author

NUMTs Can Imitate Biparental Transmission of mtDNA-A Case in <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>.

Genes·2022
Same author

FreeClimber: automated quantification of climbing performance in <i>Drosophila</i>.

The Journal of experimental biology·2020
Same author

Gap Junctions and NCA Cation Channels Are Critical for Developmentally Timed Sleep and Arousal in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>.

Genetics·2018
Same author

Genome-Wide Screen for Genes Involved in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> Developmentally Timed Sleep.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2017
Same author

Mitonuclear Epistasis for Development Time and Its Modification by Diet in Drosophila.

Genetics·2016
Same journal

Sensing Underwater: Diversifying Selection, Convergent Evolution and Inactivation in Sensory Receptors' Genes of Aquatic Mammals.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Synonymous Codons as Potential Contributors to Chromatin Stability and Gene Body Methylation in Plants.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Convergent Functional Genomic Evolution Underlying Repeated Freshwater Colonization in Cetaceans.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Conditions Enabling the Persistence of Cooperating Synthetase, Ligase, and Mutation-Inhibitor Catalytic Polymers.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Lineage-Specific Diversification of Nucleoporin Nup98 Genes in Ciliates and Its Evolutionary Implications for the Nuclear Dualism.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Mitochondrial Genome Evolution: The Influence of Partitioning, Calibration, and Gene Heterogeneity on Pleurodontan Substitution Rates.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
See all related articles

The genetic code is not random; it minimizes errors from mutations. However, it doesn't fully optimize for error minimization, balancing flexibility and fidelity across species.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • The genetic code exhibits error minimization, with substitutions favoring similar amino acids.
  • This fidelity has been proposed as an adaptation, but existing models are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a more accurate model for assessing genetic code adaptation.
  • To investigate the role of codon usage and amino acid properties in error minimization.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel model incorporating mistranslation biases, transition/transversion biases, and codon usage.
  • Accounted for variations in amino acid physicochemical characteristics using different indices.

Main Results:

  • Previous models did not consider interspecies codon usage differences.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The natural genetic code is not maximally optimized for error minimization.
  • A balance between flexibility and fidelity is achieved for various species.

    • Conclusions:

    • The genetic code represents a compromise between minimizing errors and allowing for evolutionary flexibility.
    • The proposed model offers a more nuanced understanding of genetic code optimization.