Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026
Application of Hemostatic Devices in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
Published on: April 19, 2022
Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy in managing hemodynamically stable patients with ruptured corpus luteum with
Sen-Wen Teng1, Jen-Yu Tseng, Cheng-Kun Chang
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, Hsintien; Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Study Objective:
To compare differences between laparoscopy and laparotomy in managing women ruptured corpus luteum with hemoperitoneum.
Design:
Three-year, prospective, nonrandomized study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Setting:
University-affiliated regional hospital.
Patients:
Sixty hemodynamically stable women.
Intervention:
Laparoscopic surgery (30 women) and laparotomy (30).
Measurements And Main Results:
Laparoscopic surgery had significant advantages over laparotomy, including shorter hospital stay (55.33 +/- 7.67 vs 97.77 +/- 14.45 hrs, p < 0.001) without increased adverse events. Laparoscopic surgery also showed trends of shorter operating time, improved wound care, and less postoperative pain.
Conclusion:
Laparoscopy surgery for diagnosis and treatment of women with ruptured hemorrhagic corpus luteum appears superior to laparotomy. We suggest that surgeons try laparoscopy first as a diagnostic and probably therapeutic procedure.
More Related Videos
03:33Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Guided by the Ligamentum Teres Hepatis and the Umbilical Fissure Vein
Published on: September 27, 2024
05:21Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri
Published on: September 12, 2025