Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating community-based health professions education programs.

Summers Kalishman1

  • 1Office of Program Evaluation, Education and Research, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, 87131, USA. SKalish@salud.unm.edu

Education for Health (Abingdon, England)
|January 27, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Climate Change and Human Health ECHO: Global Telementoring for Health Professionals.

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2021
Same author

Telementoring of Healthcare Teams in the Care of Miners.

ATS scholar·2021
Same author

Implementation and evaluation of a Project ECHO telementoring program for the Namibian HIV workforce.

Human resources for health·2020
Same author

A virtual community-of-practice approach by rural stakeholders in managing pneumoconiosis in the USA: a cross-sectional analysis.

Rural and remote health·2020
Same author

Strategies Used by Interprofessional Teams to Counter Healthcare Marginalization and Engage Complex Patients.

Qualitative health research·2020
Same author

Becoming outstanding educators: What do they say contributed to success?

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2020
Same journal

Interprofessional Education of Medical Students and Physician Associate Students and COVID-19: Comment.

Education for health (Abingdon, England)·2023
Same journal

Team-based Learning Impact: A Comparative Study of Student and Faculty Facilitators.

Education for health (Abingdon, England)·2023
Same journal

Creating Socially Accountable Health Conferences: Guidance from Around the World.

Education for health (Abingdon, England)·2023
Same journal

Surgical Nursing Students' Perception of Feedback in Clinical Education: A Mixed-method Study.

Education for health (Abingdon, England)·2023
Same journal

Impact of Protracted War Crisis on Dental Students: A Comparative Multicountry Cross-sectional Study.

Education for health (Abingdon, England)·2023
Same journal

Experiences of Rural and Metropolitan Background Applicants in Preparing for and Completing a Regionally Focused Multiple Mini-interview for Admission into a Regional Medical Program.

Education for health (Abingdon, England)·2023
See all related articles

This guide introduces program evaluation for community-based health professions education programs. It covers key questions, stakeholders, methods, and data analysis for effective program improvement.

Area of Science:

  • Health Professions Education
  • Program Evaluation
  • Community-Based Programs

Background:

  • Assumes limited reader knowledge of program evaluation.
  • Focuses on improving community-based health professions education programs.
  • Acknowledges diverse evaluation approaches in related literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a foundational understanding of program evaluation.
  • To guide readers through the essential questions and steps in conducting an evaluation.
  • To offer practical examples relevant to health professions education.

Main Methods:

  • Organized around a series of guiding questions for evaluation.
  • Includes discussion on identifying stakeholders and choosing evaluation methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Covers data analysis and reporting of evaluation results.

    • Main Results:

    • Presents a structured approach to program evaluation.
    • Offers practical considerations for evaluating community-based health professions education.
    • Highlights the iterative nature of evaluation and continuous learning.

    Conclusions:

    • Emphasizes the importance of program evaluation for educational improvement.
    • Encourages further exploration of evaluation methodologies.
    • Suggests pathways for ongoing professional development in evaluation.