Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prospective experience with a second-generation hand-assisted laparoscopic device and comparison with

Abhay Rané1, Prokar Dasgupta

  • 1Department of Urology, East Surrey Hospital, Canada Avenue, Redhill, Surrey RH1 5RH, UK. arane@btinternet.com

Journal of Endourology
|January 28, 2004
PubMed
Summary

The GelPort hand-assisted laparoscopy device offers improved ease of use and robustness compared to earlier models. Despite a higher cost, its user-friendliness makes it a superior option for laparoscopic procedures.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A registry-based modified IDEAL stage 2b evaluation of urological procedures performed using the versius robotic surgical system.

Journal of robotic surgery·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "The Impact of Venous Thromboembolism on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomas Undergoing Open or Minimally Invasive Radical Nephroureterectomy in the USA: Perioperative Outcomes and Health Care Costs from Insurance Claims Data".

European urology focus·2024
Same author

The impact of venous thromboembolism before open or minimally-invasive radical cystectomy in the USA: insurance claims data on perioperative outcomes and healthcare costs.

Minerva urology and nephrology·2024
Same author

The Impact of Venous Thromboembolism on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomas Undergoing Open or Minimally Invasive Radical Nephroureterectomy in the USA: Perioperative Outcomes and Health Care Costs from Insurance Claims Data.

European urology focus·2024
Same author

Current practises and the future of robotic surgical training.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland·2023
Same author

Adjuvant Intravesical Chemohyperthermia Versus Passive Chemotherapy in Patients with Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (HIVEC-II): A Phase 2, Open-label, Randomised Controlled Trial.

European urology·2022

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Devices

Background:

  • Hand-assisted laparoscopy (HAL) devices facilitate minimally invasive surgical procedures.
  • First-generation HAL devices include the Handport (1999) and Intromit (1998).
  • The second-generation GelPort HAL device was introduced in the UK in 2001.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of the second-generation GelPort HAL device with first-generation devices (Handport and Intromit).
  • To evaluate ease of application, device placement time, and perioperative complications associated with each HAL device.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective comparison of HAL devices in various urological surgeries (radical nephrectomies, nephroureterectomies, simple nephrectomies).
  • Key outcome measures included device application time, ease of use, and device-specific complications.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data collected from operations using GelPort (n=17), Handport (n=7), and Intromit (n=5).
  • Main Results:

    • GelPort demonstrated the shortest average placement time (5 minutes) compared to Handport (10 minutes) and Intromit (15 minutes).
    • The Intromit experienced two leaks, while the Handport frequently had issues with 'pop-outs' requiring resufflation.
    • GelPort was rated easiest to use and did not exhibit the complications seen with older devices.

    Conclusions:

    • The GelPort represents a more user-friendly and robust hand-assisted laparoscopy device.
    • While more expensive than first-generation devices, GelPort offers significant advantages in usability and reliability.