Supraumbilical pyloromyotomy: comparison between intracorporeal and extracorporeal approaches

Shigeru Takamizawa1, Masayuki Obatake, Toshihiro Muraji

  • 1Department of Surgery, Kobe Children's Hospital, 1-1-1 Takakuradai, Suma-ku, Kobe 654-0081, Japan. takamizawa_kch@hp.pref.hyogo.jp

Insights

Intracorporeal pyloromyotomy (ICP) offers faster feeding resumption for infants with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis compared to extracorporeal pyloromyotomy (ECP). This minimally invasive approach leads to shorter hospital stays and fewer incision extensions.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is a common condition in infants.
  • Pyloromyotomy is the standard surgical treatment for HPS.
  • Extracorporeal pyloromyotomy (ECP) has been the traditional approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate intracorporeal pyloromyotomy (ICP) as a novel alternative to ECP for HPS.
  • To compare the outcomes of ICP and ECP in infants with HPS.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of medical charts for 75 infants undergoing ICP and 29 undergoing ECP.
  • Comparison of operating time, time to full feeding, complications, and outcomes.
  • Analysis of incision extension rates and wound infections.

Main Results:

  • ICP had a longer operating time (56.4 min) than ECP (48.7 min) (p=.004).
  • ICP resulted in significantly faster return to full feeding (2.1 days) versus ECP (2.9 days) (p=.002).
  • Fewer incision extensions were needed for ICP (2/75) compared to ECP (11/29) (p<.0001).

Conclusions:

  • Intracorporeal pyloromyotomy (ICP) is a superior technique for treating hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
  • ICP facilitates earlier feeding resumption and shorter hospitalizations.
  • ICP demonstrates improved outcomes regarding incision extension compared to ECP.

Related Concept Videos