Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Coulomb Explosion Imaging as a Tool to Distinguish Between Stereoisomers
Published on: August 18, 2017
Chiral morphing and enantiomeric quantification in mixtures by mass spectrometry
Lianming Wu1, Eduardo Cesar Meurer, R Graham Cooks
1Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.
Abstract:
A novel mass spectrometric method is introduced for rapid and accurate chiral quantification by examining a tetracoordinated transition metal complex into which a reference and a fixed ligand are incorporated simultaneously with the analyte. Chiral analysis is performed by measuring the dissociation kinetics of these trimeric cluster ions [(M(II) + L(fixed) - H)(ref)(An)]+ (M(II) = a transition metal ion, L(fixed) = chiral peptide fixed ligand, ref = chiral reference ligand, and An = chiral analyte) in an ion trap mass spectrometer. The ratio of the product ion branching ratios measured when a pair of pure chiral fixed ligands and chiral reference ligands (/ref(D) and /ref(L); or /ref(L) and /ref(D)) are employed in separate experiments is related, via the kinetic method formalism, to the enantiomeric composition of the chiral mixture. This fixed-ligand quotient ratio (QR(fixed)) is logarithmically proportional to enantiomeric purity allowing construction of a calibration curve for chiral analysis when the analyte is only available in one form of known optical purity. There are reciprocal relationships when switching the chirality of the fixed/reference ligands. Improved quantification accuracy (due to simplified dissociation kinetics) and ready construction of two or more single-point calibration curves allow data to be cross-checked and represent an advantage of this approach. These features and the matrix tolerance of the kinetic method are demonstrated using the QR(fixed) method for determinations of enantiomeric excess of the drug DOPA in the presence of the co-drug compound L-carbidopa. The chiral selectivity of DOPA was found to vary from 0.0581 to 0.337 using this method, depending on the choices of fixed-ligand and reference chirality. The average relative errors are less than 1.2%. The potential of chiral morphing (changing chiral centers in the ligands) to further refine the chiral interactions and hence to maximize chiral recognition is shown.
Related Concept Videos
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
Racemic Mixtures and the Resolution of Enantiomers
¹H NMR Chemical Shift Equivalence: Enantiotopic and Diastereotopic Protons
In chiral compounds such as 2-butanol, replacing the methylene hydrogens at C3 produces a pair of...
Properties of Enantiomers and Optical Activity
Prochirality
Chirality at Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Sulfur
A consequence of chirality is the need for enantiomeric resolution. While this is theoretically possible for all...

